Summary: | Disabling the Java frontend at compile time | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | erob <erob> |
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Gerald Pfeifer <gerald> |
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | ports |
Priority: | Normal | ||
Version: | Latest | ||
Hardware: | Any | ||
OS: | Any |
Description
erob
2004-02-27 02:40:07 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->gerald Over to maintainer. State Changed From-To: open->feedback In principle, I am in favor of such a patch, if - it works in both cases (which it currently does not), - the default is not changed (that is, java is built by default), - and you do not disable further languages like f77 (which you currently do). To see the problems with the current patch, please run the tests described in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-testing.html I am looking forward to an updated patch. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=63427 Adding to audit trail from misfiled PR ports/63429 by kris: > .if defined(WANT_JAVA) WANT_* is wrong, use WITH_* and WITHOUT_* for user control of build options. State Changed From-To: feedback->suspended This does seem too complex for too little benefit (since we can already disable libgcj). State Changed From-To: suspended->closed I thought this through, several times over the recent weeks, and I think we should avoid adding this extra piece of complexity -- the main benefit really can be gained be disabling libgcj, and we already have a hook for that. |