Bug 64973

Summary: Update port: www/screem 0.8.2 -> 0.10.1, repo copy www -> editors and some clean up
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Kirill Ponomarev <krion>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: coop9211
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
screem.diff
none
screem.diff none

Description Jeremy Messenger 2004-03-31 08:30:18 UTC 
- Update to 0.10.1.
- Screem is an editor. Therefore, request to repo copy
  www/screem -> editors/screem.
- Use more GNOME components (bsd.gnome.mk).
- Add lthack and intlhack, but not sure if it needs intlhack.
- Make sure the pixmaps install in share/gnome/screem/; not in
  share/screem/.
- Correct the pkg-plist.
- Remove the maintainer name/email from the pkg-descr. Reasons:
	* It's un-need.
	* We already have MAINTAINER and Whom in the Makefile.
	* Avoid the confuse it as author.
	* Looks like email is out of date?
 If you, maintainer, disagree then please say so.


--


There has a bug. Screem doesn't create the ~/.screem, so at the every time
Screem runs; it will complain about can't find/open anything in the
~/.screem. Nevertheless, it still can run and do anything.

How-To-Repeat: n/a
Comment 1 Kirill Ponomarev freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-03-31 09:41:03 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->repocopy

Repocopy request.
Comment 2 Kirill Ponomarev freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-03-31 09:41:03 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr

Repocopy request.
Comment 3 Jeremy Messenger 2004-03-31 09:55:16 UTC 
Umm, I think I used the wrong words for this? I mean, move screem in the 
correct category by www -> editors..

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Comment 4 John Merryweather Cooper 2004-03-31 13:07:10 UTC 
As noted in my mail responses, I object only to the repo-copy.  The 
address in the pkg-descr is out of date (it should be 
coop9211@uidaho.edu), but is otherwise in compliance with the porter's 
handbook.

This update is missing a LIB_DEPENDS on textproc/libcroco necessary for 
proper function of the CSS features.  The version of textproc/libcroco 
is the minimum acceptable version; the latest stable version of 
textproc/libcroco is 0.5.0.

jmc
Comment 5 Pav Lucistnik freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-03-31 14:20:57 UTC 
I too object the repocopy. HTML editors should stay in www/ category
where they always been and where they belong.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

What luck - a dagger!  This is your holder.  Rest there and let me die.
Comment 6 Pav Lucistnik freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-03-31 15:37:24 UTC 
Attached from misfiled pending/64988, mail from maintainer:

 A number of points:
 
 1) the update is good as 0.10.1 has just been released and is the stable
 version;
 
 2) the repo copy should be denied unless all of the HTML editors (such
 as bluefish) are going to be moved from www/ to editors/;
 
 3) intlhack WILL be needed on -STABLE
 
 4) hacking the pkg-descr:  a) violates the porters-handbook (as
 written); b) the e-mail is correct; c) I really don't care, but nobody
 better jerk me around on not having my pkg-descr comply with the
 handbook;
 
 5) with these provisos, please commit;
 
 jmc
Comment 7 Joe Marcus Clarke freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-03-31 19:21:37 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: repocopy->open

Let's leave things where they are now while considering the big plan for 
the ports tree.
Comment 8 Joe Marcus Clarke freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-03-31 19:21:37 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: portmgr->krion

Let's leave things where they are now while considering the big plan for 
the ports tree.
Comment 9 Jeremy Messenger 2004-03-31 19:37:23 UTC 
Here's a new diff, what do you think, John? :-)

Cheers,
Mezz


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.
Comment 10 John Merryweather Cooper 2004-03-31 19:51:02 UTC 
I'm convinced that CATEGORIES should be:

www editors gnome

It IS an editor, but I like to one-stop-shop for my HTML tools.  :)

Approved.

jmc

On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 10:37, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> Here's a new diff, what do you think, John? :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Mezz
>
Comment 11 John Merryweather Cooper 2004-04-02 21:01:40 UTC 
Yes, it's out of order.  As maintainer, I have approved the latest 
version of the patch.  Please commit (with minor modification to 
CATEGORIES discussed above).

jmc
Comment 12 Kirill Ponomarev freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-04-02 21:43:15 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Committed, thanks!