Summary: | [PATCH] news/nn: update to 6.6.5 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Sean Farley <sean-freebsd> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Volker Stolz <vs> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | CC: | jooji | ||||
Priority: | Normal | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Sean Farley
2004-04-29 19:00:37 UTC
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Waiting for maintainer feedback. Looks good to me. Please commit. State Changed From-To: feedback->open I'll take this. Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->vs I'll take this. Two comments: - It doesn't look like the port needs gmake - Some of the patching in Makefile (which I myself submitted some time ago) can be easily avoided by using MAKE_ARGS= CC=${CC} CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -s" Are there any objections if I fix this as well? Volker Two comments: - It doesn't look like the port needs gmake - Some of the patching in Makefile (which I myself submitted some time ago) can be easily avoided by using MAKE_ARGS= CC=${CC} CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -s" Are there any objections if I fix this as well? Volker On Fri, 7 May 2004, Volker Stolz wrote: > Two comments: > - It doesn't look like the port needs gmake > - Some of the patching in Makefile (which I myself submitted some time > ago) can be > easily avoided by using > MAKE_ARGS= CC=${CC} CFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" LDFLAGS="${LDFLAGS} -s" > > Are there any objections if I fix this as well? I have no objections. Sean ----------------------- sean-freebsd@farley.org State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks! |