Bug 66292

Summary: [patch] ahc.4 tyops an grammar fixes
Product: Documentation Reporter: Michel Lavondes <fox>
Component: Books & ArticlesAssignee: freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
file.diff none

Description Michel Lavondes 2004-05-05 18:40:18 UTC
Patch below says it all, really.

Fix: Patch below is also available from http://www.livejournal.com/users/pauamma/2004/05/05/
How-To-Repeat: man 4 ahc
Comment 1 Christian Brueffer 2004-05-07 13:33:21 UTC
On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Michel Lavondès wrote:
> 
> >Number:         66292
> >Category:       docs
> >Synopsis:       [patch] ahc.4 tyops an grammar fixes
> >Confidential:   no
> >Severity:       non-critical
> >Priority:       low
> >Responsible:    freebsd-doc
> >State:          open
> >Quarter:        
> >Keywords:       
> >Date-Required:
> >Class:          doc-bug
> >Submitter-Id:   current-users
> >Arrival-Date:   Wed May 05 10:40:18 PDT 2004
> >Closed-Date:
> >Last-Modified:
> >Originator:     Michel Lavond?s
> >Release:        4.8-RELEASE-p18
> >Organization:
> None whatsoever.
> >Environment:
> >Description:
> Patch below says it all, really.
> 
> >How-To-Repeat:
> man 4 ahc
> >Fix:
> Patch below is also available from http://www.livejournal.com/users/pauamma/2004/05/05/
> 
> --- ahc.4.orig	Wed May  5 07:42:33 2004
> +++ ahc.4	Wed May  5 07:42:56 2004
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@
>  Very few Adaptec controller configurations have external SRAM.
>  .Pp
>  If external SRAM is not available, SCBs are a limited resource.
> -Using the SCBs in a straight forward manner would only allow the driver to
> +Using the SCBs in a straightforward manner would only allow the driver to
>  handle as many concurrent transactions as there are physical SCBs.
>  To fully utilize the SCSI bus and the devices on it,
>  requires much more concurrency.
> >Release-Note:


According to the Oxford English dictionary, the original spelling
(straight forward) is correct.  See point 3 of the link below.

http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00238799?single=1&query_type=word&queryword=straightforward&edition=2e&first=1&max_to_show=10

- Christian

-- 
Christian Brueffer	chris@unixpages.org	brueffer@FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
Comment 2 Michel Lavondes 2004-05-07 14:41:52 UTC
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Christian Brueffer wrote:

> On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Michel Lavondès wrote:
> > 
> > ("straight forward" should be "straightforward" in ahc.4)
> 
> According to the Oxford English dictionary, the original spelling
> (straight forward) is correct.  See point 3 of the link below.
> 
> http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00238799?single=1&query_type=word&queryword=straightforward&edition=2e&first=1&max_to_show=10

Sorry, can't access that without coughing up $300, so it's not gonna
happen. :-) But M-W doesn't mention that spelling or recognizes it when
offered. See:

http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=straightforward
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=straight+forward

But I don't want to turn this into a dictionary or language flame, so I'll
let you decide. (like I have a choice anyway. :-) )

-- 
"I'd ask if you'd found the right sort of isolated wasteland for your
citadel of dread yet, but that would be a silly question; you're in Utah,
after all." --ESR to Darl McBride (Chief Excessive Ossifier of Squandered 
Clues Obstination), in http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/mcbride.html
Comment 3 Christian Brueffer 2004-05-07 15:26:55 UTC
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 09:41:52AM -0400, fox@vader.aacc.cc.md.us wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2004, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, May 05, 2004 at 10:31:13AM -0700, Michel Lavondès wrote:
> > > 
> > > ("straight forward" should be "straightforward" in ahc.4)
> > 
> > According to the Oxford English dictionary, the original spelling
> > (straight forward) is correct.  See point 3 of the link below.
> > 
> > http://dictionary.oed.com/cgi/entry/00238799?single=1&query_type=word&queryword=straightforward&edition=2e&first=1&max_to_show=10
> 
> Sorry, can't access that without coughing up $300, so it's not gonna
> happen. :-) But M-W doesn't mention that spelling or recognizes it when
> offered. See:
> 
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=straightforward
> http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=straight+forward
> 
> But I don't want to turn this into a dictionary or language flame, so I'll
> let you decide. (like I have a choice anyway. :-) )
> 


Actually they have a free web dictionary, that's where the link pointed
to :-)

This is probably a matter of American English vs. English English again,
I'm note quite sure.  I'll leave it as it is for now, as both versions
are acceptable.

Thanks for the patch anyway :-)

- Christian

-- 
Christian Brueffer	chris@unixpages.org	brueffer@FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
Comment 4 Michel Lavondes 2004-05-07 19:18:53 UTC
On Fri, 7 May 2004, Christian Brueffer wrote:

> This is probably a matter of American English vs. English English again,
> I'm note quite sure.  I'll leave it as it is for now, as both versions
> are acceptable.

OK. One thing, though: The s/dirver/driver/ that happened on the same line 
in 1.33 wasn't MFC'd. (Saw it as I added that to my local patches. :-) ) 
Lemme know if you want another change request.

-- 
"I'd ask if you'd found the right sort of isolated wasteland for your
citadel of dread yet, but that would be a silly question; you're in Utah,
after all." --ESR to Darl McBride (Chief Excessive Ossifier of Squandered 
Clues Obstination), in http://www.catb.org/~esr/writings/mcbride.html
Comment 5 Christian Brueffer 2004-05-07 19:54:41 UTC
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 02:18:53PM -0400, fox@vader.aacc.cc.md.us wrote:
> On Fri, 7 May 2004, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> 
> > This is probably a matter of American English vs. English English again,
> > I'm note quite sure.  I'll leave it as it is for now, as both versions
> > are acceptable.
> 
> OK. One thing, though: The s/dirver/driver/ that happened on the same line 
> in 1.33 wasn't MFC'd. (Saw it as I added that to my local patches. :-) ) 
> Lemme know if you want another change request.
> 


Committed, thanks!

- Christian

-- 
Christian Brueffer	chris@unixpages.org	brueffer@FreeBSD.org
GPG Key:	 http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc
GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B  B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
Comment 6 dannyboy freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-05-17 19:29:13 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

This PR looks done to me.