Bug 69143

Summary: [math/gnuplot+] fix amd64 build failure
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: NAKAJI Hiroyuki <nakaji>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
file.diff none

Description NAKAJI Hiroyuki 2004-07-16 10:40:18 UTC
	It is marked BROKEN on amd64 because FreeBSD/amd64 does not
have some IEEE FP functions like fpresetsticky(). The build failure log is
now available at
http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-full/gnuplot371+-1.2.0_1.log

	I found file/patch-za causes the problem. The feature of this
patch as reported in ports/16120 can take effect only on FreeBSD/i386.

Fix: Now files/patch-za has influence only on i386.
Comment 1 Norikatsu Shigemura freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-07-16 11:25:51 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->nork

I'll handle this.
Comment 2 Edwin Groothuis freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-07-16 11:50:54 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Commited, thanks!
Comment 3 edwin 2004-07-16 11:52:00 UTC
On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:26:07AM +0000, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->nork
> Responsible-Changed-By: nork
> Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 16 10:25:51 GMT 2004
> Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> I'll handle this.

Oops, hadn't seen this one.

Edwin

-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin@mavetju.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/
Comment 4 Norikatsu Shigemura freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-07-16 12:11:40 UTC
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 20:52:00 +1000
Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2004 at 10:26:07AM +0000, Norikatsu Shigemura wrote:
> > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->nork
> > Responsible-Changed-By: nork
> > Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Jul 16 10:25:51 GMT 2004
> > Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> > I'll handle this.
> Oops, hadn't seen this one.

	No problem.  Thank you!