| Summary: | New Port dns/mDNSResponder a re-port of Apple's mDNS responder code | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Andrew Stevenson <andrew> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Alfred Perlstein <alfred> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Andrew Stevenson
2004-08-02 17:50:23 UTC
Andrew wrote: >> Number: 69912 >> Category: ports >> Synopsis: New Port dns/mDNSResponder a re-port of Apple's mDNS >> responder code > This is a port of Apple's rendezvous. I did one of these a while back > but by > the time a committer had a chance to look at it Apple had released a new > version and hidden the old. The man pages were written a while ago and > may not > match the current versions perfectly but I don't have time to update > them > now. > > I'm suddenly getting a lot of email about my old port so I finally got > around > to this port of the current version. How does this differ from net/mDNSResponder? On 02/08/2004, at 8:20 PM, Michael Johnson wrote:
> 62.0 is already in net/mDNSResponder
Sorry I missed the addition. The only differences I can see apart from
the version is that the existing port doesn't add the missing : after
the P in the call to getopt in Responder.c (I may just report that to
apple again as they seem to have been forgotten the last report) and it
doesn't install any man pages (but the other man pages are for an older
version of mDNSResponder anyway so this probably isn't tragic).
Shouldn't that port be in the dns category? I've been away for a while
so perhaps I missed something.
Andrew
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->alfred Over to alfred, the mDNSResponder maintainer. Maybe he wants to pickup some of the changes. State Changed From-To: open->closed Superseeded by PR ports/77514 |