Bug 70595
| Summary: | add SPF patch to postfix | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Vick Khera <vivek> | ||||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Mathieu Arnold <mat> | ||||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
|
Description
Vick Khera
2004-08-17 23:00:45 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->mat Take Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->mat Take +-le 17/08/2004 17:59 -0400, Vivek Khera a dit : | |> Number: 70595 |> Category: ports |> Synopsis: add SPF patch to postfix This breaks when using SPF && TLS (and maybe others), could you have a look ? -- Mathieu Arnold State Changed From-To: open->feedback maintainer asked about a patch problem On Aug 18, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +-le 17/08/2004 17:59 -0400, Vivek Khera a dit : > | > |> Number: 70595 > |> Category: ports > |> Synopsis: add SPF patch to postfix > > This breaks when using SPF && TLS (and maybe others), could you have a > look ? > > -- > Mathieu Arnold According to Dean this is a known issue. The patches conflict (he wrote them both). There are other combinations of patches to postfix that conflict as well, but that's never held up a feature before :-) +-le 18/08/2004 10:35 -0400, Vivek Khera a dit : | | On Aug 18, 2004, at 10:20 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: | |> +-le 17/08/2004 17:59 -0400, Vivek Khera a dit : |> | |> |> Number: 70595 |> |> Category: ports |> |> Synopsis: add SPF patch to postfix |> |> This breaks when using SPF && TLS (and maybe others), could you have a |> look ? |> |> -- |> Mathieu Arnold | | According to Dean this is a known issue. The patches conflict (he wrote | them both). There are other combinations of patches to postfix that | conflict as well, but that's never held up a feature before :-) | Hum, ok, maybe you should have some checks so that users know that it's not gonna run, either in the Makefile, either in the config script no ? And maybe a special patch for TLS+SPF, because I'm not going to let TLS go, even if I want SPF :-/ -- Mathieu Arnold
On Aug 18, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote:
> Hum, ok, maybe you should have some checks so that users know that
> it's not
> gonna run, either in the Makefile, either in the config script no ?
> And maybe a special patch for TLS+SPF, because I'm not going to let
> TLS go,
> even if I want SPF :-/
>
i'll look into conflict checking, but there are so many combinations of
patches now on the postfix port that it is utterly impossible to
enumerate them all. I'll add a note for the SPF and IPV6+TLS
combination, since it is common. Perhaps we lobby Dean for a combo
patch :-)
Should I submit a revised patch or an additional patch based on this
one being applied already?
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.
+1-301-869-4449 x806
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed committed, thanks ! +-le 18/08/2004 15:30 +0000, Vivek Khera a dit : | The following reply was made to PR ports/70595; it has been noted by GNATS. | | From: Vivek Khera <vivek@khera.org> | To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org | Cc: | Subject: Re: ports/70595: add SPF patch to postfix | Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 11:25:31 -0400 | | --Apple-Mail-9-718898001 | Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit | Content-Type: text/plain; | charset=US-ASCII; | format=flowed | | | On Aug 18, 2004, at 10:40 AM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: | | > Hum, ok, maybe you should have some checks so that users know that | > it's not | > gonna run, either in the Makefile, either in the config script no ? | > And maybe a special patch for TLS+SPF, because I'm not going to let | > TLS go, | > even if I want SPF :-/ | > | | i'll look into conflict checking, but there are so many combinations of | patches now on the postfix port that it is utterly impossible to | enumerate them all. I'll add a note for the SPF and IPV6+TLS | combination, since it is common. Perhaps we lobby Dean for a combo | patch :-) | | Should I submit a revised patch or an additional patch based on this | one being applied already? Well, I just committed your patch, so, you'd better send a new PR for that :-) -- Mathieu Arnold |
