Bug 71557

Summary: [PATCH] x11-wm/pekwm: Update to 20040828 CVS snapshot
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Greg Juilfs <xcas>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Volker Stolz <vs>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
pekwm.diff none

Description Greg Juilfs 2004-09-10 14:30:28 UTC 

Update to 20040828 CVS snapshot.. bug fixes & new features. Hosted on my website due to the way they name their CVS snapshot bz2 archives as pekwm-cvs.tar.bz2

Add USE_GCC=3.3 so it doesn't core on 4.x.. thanks to arundel at bsdforums.org for testing it on 4.10

I'm willing to be the maintainer of this port if it's ok.
Comment 1 Volker Stolz freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-12-16 10:31:37 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

Do you mind if we keep the patch instead of the reinplace? 
Patches fail more loudly in case this changes in the future 
while reinplace will silently do nothing. Otherwise, this 
looks good.
Comment 2 Volker Stolz freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-12-16 10:31:37 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->vs

I'll track this
Comment 3 Greg Juilfs 2004-12-17 13:10:21 UTC 
Sure.. keeping the patch would work. Thanks.
Comment 4 Greg Juilfs 2004-12-21 15:45:06 UTC 
Revised patch is at http://bsd-unix.org/downloads/pekwm.diff

I kept the patch file.. and also added USE_AUTOCONF_VER=259.
Comment 5 Volker Stolz freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2004-12-21 16:51:27 UTC 
Just one question: How to you plan to treat versioning (PORTVERSION) when  
the next version, e.g.
0.14 or 1.0 or whatever is released?

Volker
Comment 6 Greg Juilfs 2004-12-22 13:54:54 UTC 
I was planning on using the date. For example.. if 0.1.4 gets released 
on Jan 1st, 2005.. it'd be 20050101. Maybe 0.1.3.040828 would be a 
better idea.

Would that be OK? Or would it be better to create a pekwm-devel port?
Comment 7 Volker Stolz freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-02-11 14:36:49 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: feedback->closed

Committed, thanks! I had completely forgotten about this one.