|Summary:||[patch] cleanup after removal of chinese/cle_base|
|Product:||Ports & Packages||Reporter:||Mark Linimon <linimon>|
|Component:||Individual Port(s)||Assignee:||Mark Linimon <linimon>|
|Severity:||Affects Only Me||CC:||obrien|
Description Mark Linimon 2004-12-20 00:20:10 UTC
Recently I removed chinese/cle_base as part of our process of reaping ports with unfixed security problems. obrien has pointed out that I failed to remove all the remnants -- in this case, various CONFLICTS lines. (He has already removed the one in emulators/linux_base-gentoo-stage1). I would go ahead and commit this myself immediately except for the fact that I know there are other patches circulating that affect these ports, including proposed repocopies. Thus, I am Cc:ing everyone that I am aware of that is working in that area. I'll assign it to myself, but wait to be advised about whether it would create any conflicts before proceeding. How-To-Repeat: (n/a)
Comment 1 Mark Linimon 2004-12-20 00:24:29 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->linimon I made the mess, I get to clean it up, but only if it doesn't break anything else even further.
Comment 2 Trevor Johnson 2004-12-20 14:51:20 UTC
This is fine by me--thanks for asking. -- Trevor Johnson
Comment 3 Trevor Johnson 2004-12-21 19:54:56 UTC
I needed to change the CONFLICTS lines after adding the linux_base-rh-9 and linux_base-suse-9.1 ports, so I went ahead and took out the cle_base references at the same time. This PR can be closed. -- Trevor Johnson
Comment 4 Mark Linimon 2004-12-21 20:10:26 UTC
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Trevor Johnson wrote: > I needed to change the CONFLICTS lines after adding the linux_base-rh-9 > and linux_base-suse-9.1 ports, so I went ahead and took out the cle_base > references at the same time. This PR can be closed. OK, thanks for taking care of this. mcl
Comment 5 Mark Linimon 2004-12-21 20:12:51 UTC
State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed by trevor as part of a related change to these ports.