Bug 77822

Summary: (summary missing)
Product: Base System Reporter: Andrew Bernard <andrewb>
Component: kernAssignee: freebsd-bugs (Nobody) <bugs>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: pbelle
Priority: Normal    
Version: 1.0-CURRENT   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   

Description Andrew Bernard 2005-02-21 02:10:10 UTC
 Hi,
 
 I've been having the same problem with FreeBSD 5.3 and my BT-958.
 
 It looks like the drive or the BT-958 is returning zero for its
 "period factor" for whatever reason.  The kernel code in
 src/sys/cam/scsi/scsi_all.c doesn't check for this (probably invalid)
 case and proceeds to use zero as a divisor at line 2329.
 
 Applying the following patch at line 2302 heads off the divide
 by zero and assumes that a "period factor" of zero means
 20 mbit/sec SCSI:
 
 2302c2302,2303
 <       { 0x0c, 5000 }  /* FAST-20 */
 ---
 >       { 0x0c, 5000 }, /* FAST-20 */
 >       { 0x00, 5000 }  /* FAST-20 */
 
 This enables the drive to come up normally.
 
 I've been using this patch on my home system for about a week
 now, with no apparent problems (but use at your own risk!).
 I don't know whether it's safe to assume FAST-20 when the
 BT-958 returns zero for its "period factor", but I think
 that the kernel should at least be checking for a zero divisor
 and reporting a device error instead of bringing the whole
 system down on a zero divide fault.
 
 Please let me know if any additional information would be helpful.
 
 Thanks,
 
 Andrew Bernard
Comment 1 Mark Linimon freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-02-21 13:46:05 UTC
Responsible Changed
From-To: gnats-admin->freebsd-bugs

You've managed to do a followup while supressing the Summary: line, 
which is what GNATS uses to assign new text as followup, so neither 
GNATS (nor I for that matter) have any idea what PR the text in 
this PR is supposed to be a followup to.  Please reply with that 
information and I'll try to fix it up.  Thanks.
Comment 2 Mark Linimon freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2005-04-01 07:32:49 UTC
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Feedback timeout.  With the Synopsis (Subject:) line suppressed, GNATS 
is unable to figure out to which PR the followup is supposed to apply. 
I could not figure it out myself and the submitter did not respond to 
an emailed request.