| Summary: | [patch] Building www from cvs without doc | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Devon H. O'Dell <dodell> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Devon H. O'Dell
2005-03-01 12:40:11 UTC
On 2005.03.01 13:34:00 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
>
> I might be missing something here, but it appears to me to be
> impossible to build the www tree without also having the doc/
> module.
This is correct - it's a choice, not a bug. The web site you will get
built withoing having doc/ is incomplete, though you can do www/ build
without doc/ to do tests of most individual pages.
This should probably be documented more clearly...
--
Simon L. Nielsen
On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 13:51 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote:
> On 2005.03.01 13:34:00 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> >
> > I might be missing something here, but it appears to me to be
> > impossible to build the www tree without also having the doc/
> > module.
>
> This is correct - it's a choice, not a bug. The web site you will get
> built withoing having doc/ is incomplete, though you can do www/ build
> without doc/ to do tests of most individual pages.
>
> This should probably be documented more clearly...
>
Then perhaps it would be beneficial to apply the second part of the
patch only? It seems logical that this is only an issue for people new
to the www build process (such as myself, heh), so just typing ``make''
and having it tell me about the WEB_ONLY knob as well would probably
save some confusion in the future.
Sorry if this is well-documented on the list; I guess I should have
searched here first.
--Devon
On 2005.03.01 13:54:57 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > On Tue, 2005-03-01 at 13:51 +0100, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: > > On 2005.03.01 13:34:00 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > > > > > > I might be missing something here, but it appears to me to be > > > impossible to build the www tree without also having the doc/ > > > module. > > > > This is correct - it's a choice, not a bug. The web site you will get > > built withoing having doc/ is incomplete, though you can do www/ build > > without doc/ to do tests of most individual pages. > > > > This should probably be documented more clearly... > > Then perhaps it would be beneficial to apply the second part of the > patch only? It seems logical that this is only an issue for people new > to the www build process (such as myself, heh), so just typing ``make'' > and having it tell me about the WEB_ONLY knob as well would probably > save some confusion in the future. Yes, I will try to have a look at it when I get home tonight. > Sorry if this is well-documented on the list; I guess I should have > searched here first. Well, I actually don't think it is... The dependency was added when the mirror list was started to be auto generated from XML, I don't think it has been brought up later. In general not that many people build www/ by them self :-). -- Simon L. Nielsen State Changed From-To: open->closed I committed an improved the error message based on the patch in the PR. Thanks for the submission! |