Summary: | Warning cleanups for graphics/URT port | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | giffunip <giffunip> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Simon Barner <barner> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
Priority: | Normal | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
giffunip
2005-03-11 06:00:16 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->barner Grab. [Cc'ed freebsd-ports, further discussion should happen there] Hello Pedro, others, IMHO these kinds of patches do not belong into the ports collection in the first place. While they are correct, and reduce the number of compiler warnings and improve the general quality of the code, they are not necessary to make the software run on FreeBSD. Is there any chance to have those changes integrated upstream, i.e. by the authors of URT? If that's not the case (because the software is abandoned), or the do not plan a new release within a reasonable timeframe, I'd prefer to have those patches bundled in one file, say patch-FIX-WARNINGS, so that our repository is not clobbered with a dozend of small, non-FreeBSD specific patches. So, to sum this up: I really appreciate your work very much, but IMO the ports collection is not the best place to store your patches. Perhaps someone else from the ports@ list can share her/his opinion with us? Simon State Changed From-To: open->closed Patches committed, thank you very much for your submission! |