Summary: | New port: www/mediawiki14 as a clone from www/mediawiki | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Gerrit Beine <tux> | ||||
Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Pav Lucistnik <pav> | ||||
Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
Priority: | Normal | ||||||
Version: | Latest | ||||||
Hardware: | Any | ||||||
OS: | Any | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Gerrit Beine
2005-04-16 13:40:19 UTC
If this is the exact same port but with modifications, should this not then first be a repocopy? Am Samstag, 16. April 2005 21:20 schrieb Mark Linimon: > The following reply was made to PR ports/80001; it has been noted by GNAT= S. > > From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> > To: Gerrit Beine <tux@pinguru.net> > Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, > <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org> > Subject: Re: ports/80001: New port: www/mediawiki14 as a clone from > www/mediawiki Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2005 14:16:17 -0500 (CDT) > > If this is the exact same port but with modifications, should this not > then first be a repocopy? > Yes, I think that's the right way. It is a copy of the current mediawiki port and the only difference is the newer version. So long... Gerrit =2D-=20 Ich spul den Film zur=FCck Bis zu jeder Stelle, bis zu jenem Tag Als es noch nicht weg war Das Gl=FCck mail tux@pinguru.net icq 123851585 web http://arme-und-beine.de State Changed From-To: open->feedback Would it make more sense to copy existing port to mediawiki13 and update mediawiki port to 1.4? Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->pav Track State Changed From-To: feedback->repocopy www/mediawiki -> www/mediawiki13 Responsible Changed From-To: pav->portmgr pav to handle, thanks State Changed From-To: repocopy->open Repo-copy completed. Responsible Changed From-To: portmgr->pav Repo-copy completed. State Changed From-To: open->closed Committed, thanks! |