Bug 80290
| Summary: | [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | Wojciech A. Koszek <dunstan> | ||||
| Component: | Books & Articles | Assignee: | freebsd-doc (Nobody) <doc> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Wojciech A. Koszek
2005-04-23 22:00:36 UTC
> >Description: > mount(8) manual page uses wrong filesystem name. > >How-To-Repeat: > man mount | col -b | grep nonfs This is not a bug. Please read the man page and you'll find that "nonfs" is correct. Best Regards -- Rionda aka Matteo Riondato Disinformato per default G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org) > >Description: > mount(8) manual page uses wrong filesystem name. > >How-To-Repeat: > man mount | col -b | grep nonfs This is not a bug. Please read the man page and you'll find that "nonfs" is correct. Best Regards -- Rionda aka Matteo Riondato Disinformato per default G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-bugs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" State Changed From-To: open->closed This is not a typo, nonfs is the intended word. On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:57:27AM +0000, Jesus R. Camou wrote: > Synopsis: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8 > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: jcamou > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 24 02:55:58 GMT 2005 > State-Changed-Why: > This is not a typo, nonfs is the intended word. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80290 Hello, I was thinking about this mistake, and it seems I've posted wrong patch. I mean I know "nonfs" is correct, but we should have also "nonullfs", since neither NFS nor NULLFS has to be mounted. Sorry and thanks! Best regards, -- * Wojciech A. Koszek && dunstan@FreeBSD.czest.pl --- diff.1.mount.8 begins here --- Index: src/sbin/mount/mount.8 =================================================================== RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sbin/mount/mount.8,v retrieving revision 1.72 diff -r1.72 mount.8 372c372 < mount -a -t nonfs,nullfs --- > mount -a -t nonfs,nonullfs --- diff.1.mount.8 ends here --- On 2005.04.24 07:00:39 +0000, Wojciech A. Koszek wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 02:57:27AM +0000, Jesus R. Camou wrote:
> > Synopsis: [PATCH] "nonfs" instead of "nfs" in mount.8
> >
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: jcamou
> > State-Changed-When: Sun Apr 24 02:55:58 GMT 2005
> > State-Changed-Why:
> > This is not a typo, nonfs is the intended word.
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80290
>
> Hello,
>
> I was thinking about this mistake, and it seems I've posted
> wrong patch. I mean I know "nonfs" is correct, but we should
> have also "nonullfs", since neither NFS nor NULLFS has to be
> mounted.
The manual page states:
[...] The list of file system types can be pre-
fixed with ``no'' to specify the file system types for which
action should not be taken. For example, the mount command:
It's the list that can be prefixed, not the filesystem name itself.
From a quick check here on 6.0-CURRENT, that also seems to be what it
does. Maybee the manual page can be clarified to make that point more
clear, but I'm not sure exactly how...
--
Simon L. Nielsen
|
