| Summary: | repocopy request from xorg-server to x11-servers/xorg-server-snap | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Eric Anholt <anholt> |
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Eric Anholt <anholt> |
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||
| Priority: | Normal | ||
| Version: | Latest | ||
| Hardware: | Any | ||
| OS: | Any | ||
|
Description
Eric Anholt
2005-04-23 22:20:09 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->portmgr Send it portmgr's way. Responsible Changed From-To: portmgr->anholt Repocopy completed. Any reason why would would choose -snap instead of -devel? I think we have more of the latter than the former. On Sun, 2005-04-24 at 02:27 -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > Any reason why would would choose -snap instead of -devel? I think > we have more of the latter than the former. Yeah, but it had been suggested at some point for a replacement for -devel and I don't recall loud complainig. The -dev suffix is often assiciated with headers thanks to the debian crowd, which is why I like to avoid -devel. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org State Changed From-To: open->closed Repocopy was finished and the port committed. Thanks, portmgr! |