Bug 85144

Comment 1 Mark Linimon 2005-08-20 09:31:45 UTC

Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-i386

may be i386-specific

The Asus K8S-MX is an AMD Athlon64 motherboard.
(1)	6.0-BETA2-amd64-disc1 recognized the SiS SATA chip
and installed the OS onto the SATA hard drive.
(2)	6.0-BETA2-amd64-disc1 does not recognize the SiS
integrated LAN.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com

Thanks,  Graham/

Comment 4 Mark Linimon 2005-09-18 03:18:20 UTC

Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-amd64

Submitter notes that this is an AMD64 board.  The on-board SATA controller 
is now recognized by 6.0 but the on-board network driver still is not.

On Saturday 17 September 2005 07:19 pm, Mark Linimon wrote:
> Synopsis: Asus K8S-MX mobo, integ LAN not recognized, SATA neither
>
> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-amd64
> Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
> Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Sep 18 02:18:20 GMT 2005
> Responsible-Changed-Why:
> Submitter notes that this is an AMD64 board.  The on-board SATA
> controller is now recognized by 6.0 but the on-board network driver
> still is not.

This is almost a zero-content PR.  And I'm not sure what pointing it to 
the -amd64 list is going to achieve.  Its a network driver missing, not 
an amd64 port problem.  It applies to both i386 and amd64 kernels.  And 
the amd64 users are not exactly in a position to resolve the PR.

In fact, most of the PR's set to 'amd64' are mis-filed. These days, the 
list is for users more so than developers.

-- 
Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com
"All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5

Comment 6 Tilman Keskinoz 2006-07-06 12:51:20 UTC

State Changed
From-To: open->closed

As Peter wrote, this is an "almost zero-content" PR.  
FreeBSD does not claim to suppport the SiS 190 based NICs