| Summary: | Fix breakage in security/fragroute | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Ports & Packages | Reporter: | Jonathan <afarsec> | ||||
| Component: | Individual Port(s) | Assignee: | Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt> | ||||
| Status: | Closed FIXED | ||||||
| Severity: | Affects Only Me | ||||||
| Priority: | Normal | ||||||
| Version: | Latest | ||||||
| Hardware: | Any | ||||||
| OS: | Any | ||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Jonathan
2005-12-04 23:30:02 UTC
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ehaupt Take. I couldn't reproduce the buildlog on a current 6.0-STABLE machine. There is also no indication from pointyhat.freebsd.org that the port is broken. I saw you're using 6.0-BETA4 and you're using '-march=pentium4m'. Does the port break without '-march=pentium4m'? Regards, Emanuel -- GnuPG key id: 0x55E67774 Download: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: 17B3 FD8F BA68 4AB4 10FD A9D1 AD52 6588 55E6 7774 State Changed From-To: open->feedback Ask for maintainer feedback. On 12/5/05, Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@freebsd.org> wrote: > I couldn't reproduce the buildlog on a current 6.0-STABLE machine. There > is also no indication from pointyhat.freebsd.org that the port is > broken. I saw you're using 6.0-BETA4 and you're using > '-march=3Dpentium4m'. Does the port break without '-march=3Dpentium4m'? It was reproduced on my laptop, with 6.0-STABLE (the BETA4 is just the server I send-pr from). It's the same issue that was reported in ports/86132. I'm seeing it in security/dsniff too, so it's probably relevant to the recent libnet changes. > It was reproduced on my laptop, with 6.0-STABLE (the BETA4 is just the > server I send-pr > from). > It's the same issue that was reported in ports/86132. > I'm seeing it in security/dsniff too, so it's probably relevant to the > recent libnet changes. Thanks for clarifying. Would you like to take maintainership of this port? -- GnuPG key id: 0x55E67774 Download: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371 Key fingerprint: 17B3 FD8F BA68 4AB4 10FD A9D1 AD52 6588 55E6 7774 > Thanks for clarifying. Would you like to take maintainership of this
> port?
sure.
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed, thanks! |