Bug 98760

Summary: [MAINTAINER] www/dokuwiki: update to 2006-06-09 snapshot
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: chinsan <chinsan.tw>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Aaron Dalton <aaron>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me CC: clsung
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
dokuwiki-20060609.patch none

Description chinsan 2006-06-09 18:30:18 UTC 
- Update to 2006-06-09 snapshot

Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.77
Comment 1 Aaron Dalton freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-09 20:02:42 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->aaron

I'll take it.
Comment 2 Aaron Dalton freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-09 20:14:18 UTC 
Chinsan, I submitted a security patch for dokuwiki a number of days ago 
as ports/98599 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/98599) 
and haven't heard from you yet.  As for upgrading to a snapshot version, 
that is generally not desireable.  The main port really should be the 
latest stable.  If you think there is a long-term benefit to having the 
bleeding-edge release available to the public, then perhaps you can 
request a repocopy and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel or something 
like that.  What are your thoughts?

-- 
Aaron Dalton
aaron@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Ports Committer
Comment 3 chinsan 2006-06-09 20:40:51 UTC 
2006/6/10, Aaron Dalton <aaron@freebsd.org>:
> Chinsan, I submitted a security patch for dokuwiki a number of days ago
> as ports/98599 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/98599)
> and haven't heard from you yet.  As for upgrading to a snapshot version,
> that is generally not desireable.  The main port really should be the
> latest stable.  If you think there is a long-term benefit to having the
> bleeding-edge release available to the public, then perhaps you can
> request a repocopy and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel or something
> like that.  What are your thoughts?
>
Dear Aaron Dalton & Kris:

I saw your ports/98599 and agreed with ports/98599...but I have not
too much time last week to reply your PR for approve...Sorry :)
(Because my company had decided to move our main IDC to another place
last week..
so I am narcose or sleeping at daytime ...and move our machine at night..
It's very crazy and Orz..)
Thanks foy your quickly summit for that PR.

But, there's something problem due to the 2006-03-09 tarball has been
rerolled again.
Therefore, The file size of on ftp-master.freebsd.org and ports/98599
are both mismatch.

Now dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz on
http://www.splitbrain.org/_media/projects/dokuwiki/ is
MD5 (dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz) = 73db29a2e92f5708d91cf1a535290000
SIZE (dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz) = 835163
May Kris refetch this file again and fix the distonfo? thanks!

Therefore, in my opinion, I prefer to put it to somewhere to avoid
"rerolled tarball" confused.

Okay, I want to change this PR(ports/98760) as a request for repo copy
and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel.


Thanks again,
chinsan
Comment 4 chinsan 2006-06-09 20:40:51 UTC 
2006/6/10, Aaron Dalton <aaron@freebsd.org>:
> Chinsan, I submitted a security patch for dokuwiki a number of days ago
> as ports/98599 (http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/98599)
> and haven't heard from you yet.  As for upgrading to a snapshot version,
> that is generally not desireable.  The main port really should be the
> latest stable.  If you think there is a long-term benefit to having the
> bleeding-edge release available to the public, then perhaps you can
> request a repocopy and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel or something
> like that.  What are your thoughts?
>
Dear Aaron Dalton & Kris:

I saw your ports/98599 and agreed with ports/98599...but I have not
too much time last week to reply your PR for approve...Sorry :)
(Because my company had decided to move our main IDC to another place
last week..
so I am narcose or sleeping at daytime ...and move our machine at night..
It's very crazy and Orz..)
Thanks foy your quickly summit for that PR.

But, there's something problem due to the 2006-03-09 tarball has been
rerolled again.
Therefore, The file size of on ftp-master.freebsd.org and ports/98599
are both mismatch.

Now dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz on
http://www.splitbrain.org/_media/projects/dokuwiki/ is
MD5 (dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz) = 73db29a2e92f5708d91cf1a535290000
SIZE (dokuwiki-2006-03-09.tgz) = 835163
May Kris refetch this file again and fix the distonfo? thanks!

Therefore, in my opinion, I prefer to put it to somewhere to avoid
"rerolled tarball" confused.

Okay, I want to change this PR(ports/98760) as a request for repo copy
and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel.


Thanks again,
chinsan
Comment 5 Aaron Dalton freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-09 20:55:36 UTC 
chinsan wrote:
> Dear Aaron Dalton & Kris:
> 
> I saw your ports/98599 and agreed with ports/98599...but I have not
> too much time last week to reply your PR for approve...Sorry :)

It's not a problem, Chinsan.  I will commit the update.

> 
> But, there's something problem due to the 2006-03-09 tarball has been
> rerolled again.
> Therefore, The file size of on ftp-master.freebsd.org and ports/98599
> are both mismatch.
> 

I will verify the new tarball and reroll it.

> 
> Therefore, in my opinion, I prefer to put it to somewhere to avoid
> "rerolled tarball" confused.
> 

Well this happens when security fixes occur and bumping PORTREVISION 
still informs users of the need to upgrade.  It's not a big deal.

> Okay, I want to change this PR(ports/98760) as a request for repo copy
> and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel.
> 

I'm unsure if you will need a new PR or not.  Clsung, I see you're Cc'd. 
  Does he need to submit a new PR?

Cheers!
-- 
Aaron Dalton
aaron@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Ports Committer
Comment 6 Aaron Dalton freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-09 20:55:36 UTC 
chinsan wrote:
> Dear Aaron Dalton & Kris:
> 
> I saw your ports/98599 and agreed with ports/98599...but I have not
> too much time last week to reply your PR for approve...Sorry :)

It's not a problem, Chinsan.  I will commit the update.

> 
> But, there's something problem due to the 2006-03-09 tarball has been
> rerolled again.
> Therefore, The file size of on ftp-master.freebsd.org and ports/98599
> are both mismatch.
> 

I will verify the new tarball and reroll it.

> 
> Therefore, in my opinion, I prefer to put it to somewhere to avoid
> "rerolled tarball" confused.
> 

Well this happens when security fixes occur and bumping PORTREVISION 
still informs users of the need to upgrade.  It's not a big deal.

> Okay, I want to change this PR(ports/98760) as a request for repo copy
> and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel.
> 

I'm unsure if you will need a new PR or not.  Clsung, I see you're Cc'd. 
  Does he need to submit a new PR?

Cheers!
-- 
Aaron Dalton
aaron@FreeBSD.org
FreeBSD Ports Committer
Comment 7 Cheng-Lung Sung freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-10 02:43:42 UTC 
On Fri, Jun 09, 2006 at 01:55:36PM -0600, Aaron Dalton wrote:
> chinsan wrote:
> >Okay, I want to change this PR(ports/98760) as a request for repo copy
> >and create a new port www/dokuwiki-devel.
> >
> 
> I'm unsure if you will need a new PR or not.  Clsung, I see you're Cc'd. 
>  Does he need to submit a new PR?


Hi,

    IMHO, close this PR and file a new one. That may make portmgr fasten
    on repocopy :-)

Thanks,

-- 
Cheng-Lung Sung - clsung@
Comment 8 Aaron Dalton freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-10 02:53:18 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->closed

Please reissue this PR with the subject [repocopy] www/dokuwiki -> 
www/dokuwiki-devel