Bug 99083

Summary: [NEW PORT] databases/rth: Web-based tool to manage requirements and tests
Product: Ports & Packages Reporter: Jan Siml <jsi>
Component: Individual Port(s)Assignee: Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu <itetcu>
Status: Closed FIXED    
Severity: Affects Only Me    
Priority: Normal    
Version: Latest   
Hardware: Any   
OS: Any   
Attachments:
Description Flags
rth-1.5.4.shar none

Description Jan Siml 2006-06-17 18:40:10 UTC 
rth is a web-based tool designed to manage requirements, tests, 
test results, and defects throughout the application life cycle. 
The tool provides a structured approach to software testing and 
increases the visibility of the testing process by creating a 
common repository for all test assets including requirements, 
test cases, test plans, and test results. Regardless of their 
geographic location, rth allows testers, developers, business 
analysts, and managers to monitor and gauge application 
readiness. The tool includes modules for requirements management, 
test planning, test execution, defect tracking, and reporting.

WWW:	http://rth-is-quality.com/
Comment 1 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-18 21:59:18 UTC 
Responsible Changed
From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->itetcu

I'll take it.
Comment 2 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-18 22:30:46 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: open->feedback

I think CATEGORIES= devel www is more appropiate, do you agree ?
Comment 3 Jan Siml 2006-06-19 10:56:25 UTC 
> I think CATEGORIES= devel www is more appropiate, do you agree ?

Is it possible to use CATEGORIES= databases devel www? Because rth is  
a database. If not, please add the port to devel and www.

Thanks.
Comment 4 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-19 11:02:22 UTC 
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 11:56:25 +0200
Jan Siml <jsi@jules.de> wrote:

> > I think CATEGORIES= devel www is more appropiate, do you agree ?
> 
> Is it possible to use CATEGORIES= databases devel www? Because rth is  
> a database. If not, please add the port to devel and www.


It's possible, but it is really a database or database-related software
(like the other ports in databases) ? I uses a database, true, but I
don't see how it fits in databases category.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #270:
Someone has messed up the kernel pointers
Comment 5 Jan Siml 2006-06-19 11:19:43 UTC 
>> > I think CATEGORIES= devel www is more appropiate, do you agree ?
>>
>> Is it possible to use CATEGORIES= databases devel www? Because rth is
>> a database. If not, please add the port to devel and www.
>
> It's possible, but it is really a database or database-related software
> (like the other ports in databases) ? I uses a database, true, but I
> don't see how it fits in databases category.

If the category databases is meant for database management systems and  
real databases only than please don't add rth there. As suggested by  
yourself use devel and www instead of. I was blinded by the port of  
mantis.

Thanks in advance.
Comment 6 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-19 11:22:30 UTC 
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:19:43 +0200
Jan Siml <jsi@jules.de> wrote:

> >> > I think CATEGORIES= devel www is more appropiate, do you agree ?
> >>
> >> Is it possible to use CATEGORIES= databases devel www? Because rth is
> >> a database. If not, please add the port to devel and www.
> >
> > It's possible, but it is really a database or database-related software
> > (like the other ports in databases) ? I uses a database, true, but I
> > don't see how it fits in databases category.
> 
> If the category databases is meant for database management systems and  
> real databases only than please don't add rth there. As suggested by  
> yourself use devel and www instead of. I was blinded by the port of  
> mantis.


Hmm, yes, I wonder what mantis is doing in databases.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

... bacteriological warfare ... hard to believe we were once foolish
enough to play around with that.
		-- McCoy, "The Omega Glory", stardate unknown
Comment 7 Jan Siml 2006-06-21 00:28:15 UTC 
Should I submit a patch for the Makefile or will you change the
categories when you commit the new port?
Comment 8 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-21 00:34:24 UTC 
On Wed, 21 Jun 2006 01:28:15 +0200
Jan Siml <jsi@jules.de> wrote:

> Should I submit a patch for the Makefile or will you change the
> categories when you commit the new port?


I'll do it.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #400:
We are Microsoft.  What you are experiencing is not a problem; it
is an undocumented feature.
Comment 9 Ion-Mihai "IOnut" Tetcu freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2006-06-21 22:34:05 UTC 
State Changed
From-To: feedback->closed

New port added, with minor changes. Thanks!