1 update to 0.4.2 from 0.1.1 2 use USE_RUBYGEMS=yes to build and install the port Fix: Patch attached with submission follows:
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->ruby Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
Hi Wen! Thanks for your patch! Personally, I'd prefer to stay back from switching to gem version as I don't see much benefit for this step. Why have you decided to switch to gem? Besides introducing new dependency on the old gem version, this will also possible break application that people use as this will require changes to this application sorce code to function properly with gems (require gems). Can you please, submit the patch against the current version without changing it to using gems? Thanks! -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE
Hi, stas@ : With its previous Makefile and Makefile.common, ruby-dbi and other ruby-dbd_* is some dificult to update. And in my plan, I shall update all the ruby-dbd_* ports which require ruby-dbi to the newest version and use gem and modify the depends. I do not know which one is welcomed more for ruby port: gem or not gem. If not gem, I will try to update it without gem and then submit the new patch and close this PR. Cheers, wen
On Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:14:02 +0800 wen heping <wenheping@gmail.com> mentioned: > Hi, stas@ : > > With its previous Makefile and Makefile.common, ruby-dbi and > other ruby-dbd_* is some dificult to update. And in my plan, I shall update > all the ruby-dbd_* ports which require ruby-dbi to the newest version > and use gem and modify the depends. > > I do not know which one is welcomed more for ruby port: gem > or not gem. If not gem, I will try to update it without gem and then > submit the new patch and close this PR. > > Cheers, > wen > > On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 5:40 AM, Stanislav Sedov <stas@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > Hi Wen! > > > > Thanks for your patch! Personally, I'd prefer to stay back > > from switching to gem version as I don't see much benefit > > for this step. Why have you decided to switch to gem? > > Besides introducing new dependency on the old gem version, > > this will also possible break application that people use > > as this will require changes to this application sorce code > > to function properly with gems (require gems). > > > > Can you please, submit the patch against the current version > > without changing it to using gems? > > Yeah, I think that staying away from gems for this module is the preferrable way to go. You may submit the new patch to update ruby-dbd* ports as followup to this PR. Thanks! -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE
State Changed From-To: open->closed Close per submitter request.
Stanislav Sedov schrieb:, > Thanks for your patch! Personally, I'd prefer to stay back > from switching to gem version as I don't see much benefit > for this step. Why have you decided to switch to gem? > Besides introducing new dependency on the old gem version, > this will also possible break application that people use > as this will require changes to this application sorce code > to function properly with gems (require gems). > > Can you please, submit the patch against the current version > without changing it to using gems? I have already a patch set for dbi and dbd. I wait for the expiration of modules that are no longer supported by the new version. modules set for expire: ruby-dbd_interbase ruby-dbd_msql ruby-dbd_proxy modules updated: ruby-dbd_mysql ruby-dbd_odbc ruby-dbd_pg ruby-dbd_sqlite ruby-dbi new modules. ruby-dbd_sqlite3 Preview: http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/ports/ruby-dbd_mysql.tar.gz http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/ports/ruby-dbd_odbc.tar.gz http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/ports/ruby-dbd_pg.tar.gz http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/ports/ruby-dbd_sqlite.tar.gz http://people.freebsd.org/~dinoex/ports/ruby-dbi.tar.gz kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org]