libfprint was discontinued on github, but revived on freedesktop.org. The latest version is 0.4.0.
Some new drivers depend on nss, not just openssl.
Fix: I set myself as the maintainer in the patch, btw.
I'll take it.
Build fails on FreeBSD-7.4, please see:
Dnia 2011-10-02, o godz. 11:19:28
Zhihao Yuan <firstname.lastname@example.org> napisa=B3(a):
>The version of libusb for FreeBSD < 8 is libusb-0.1x, which does not
>meet the requirement of the new version. So should we just mark it
>ignore for FreeBSD < 8?
Yes, I think it can be safely marked IGNORE for < 8. Only 2 ports
depend on it:
and the are not that important.
pozdrawiam / with regards
pawel 2011-10-02 18:41:21 UTC
FreeBSD ports repository
security/libfprint Makefile distinfo
security/libfprint/files extra-patch-usb patch-Makefile.in
- Update to version 0.4.0
- Mark MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE
- Mark IGNORE on FreeBSD < 8, needs libusb>=1.0
- Pass maintainership to submitter
Submitted by: Zhihao Yuan <email@example.com>
Approved by: miwi, wen (mentors implicit)
Revision Changes Path
1.12 +9 -10 ports/security/libfprint/Makefile
1.3 +2 -2 ports/security/libfprint/distinfo
1.2 +0 -118 ports/security/libfprint/files/extra-patch-usb (dead)
1.2 +0 -11 ports/security/libfprint/files/patch-Makefile.in (dead)
1.1 +11 -0 ports/security/libfprint/files/patch-config.h.in (new)
1.2 +0 -11 ports/security/libfprint/files/patch-configure (dead)
1.2 +10 -10 ports/security/libfprint/files/patch-libfprint_Makefile.in
1.2 +0 -10 ports/security/libfprint/files/patch-libfprint_data.c (dead)
1.2 +0 -11 ports/security/libfprint/files/patch-libfprint_imgdev.c (dead)
firstname.lastname@example.org mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "email@example.com"
Committed, with minor changes. Thanks!