as you can see on vlan408 there is arp reply messages from localhost but on igb0 there is arp replay traffic. Fix: Does that related to save energy subsystem of LAN card? (it turns off, but do not turn on something) How-To-Repeat: on the switch turn off port where igb0 is connected, reboot system, leave system in this state for two days, after two days trun on port: # ifconfig igb0 igb0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=1bb<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,JUMBO_MTU,VLAN_HWCSUM,TSO4> ether 00:1b:21:45:da:b8 inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe45:dab8%igb0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) status: active # ifconfig vlan408 vlan408: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=3<RXCSUM,TXCSUM> ether 00:1b:21:45:da:b8 inet 10.11.19.54 netmask 0xfffffff8 broadcast 10.11.19.55 inet6 fe80::21b:21ff:fe45:dab8%vlan408 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x23 nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet autoselect (1000baseT <full-duplex>) status: active vlan: 408 parent interface: igb0 on one console: # tcpdump -n -i vlan408 tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on vlan408, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 23:26:55.636979 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.54 tell 10.11.19.53, length 46 23:26:55.636996 ARP, Reply 10.11.19.54 is-at 00:1b:21:45:da:b8, length 28 23:26:56.842635 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.51 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 23:26:57.841024 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.51 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 23:26:58.616629 IP 10.11.19.54.42483 > 10.11.19.53.22: Flags [S], seq 1536743224, win 8192, options [mss 1460,sackOK,eol], length 0 23:26:58.841133 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.51 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 23:26:59.309114 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.50 tell 10.11.19.54, length 28 23:27:00.558856 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.50 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 23:27:00.700957 IP 10.11.19.54.53179 > 10.11.19.53.22: Flags [S], seq 1698787765, win 8192, options [mss 1460,nop,wscale 9,sackOK,TS val 1581662728 ecr 0], length 0 on other console: # tcpdump -n -i igb0 -XXX 23:26:55.636975 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.54 tell 10.11.19.53, length 46 0x0000: ffff ffff ffff 0030 679d 8f26 8100 0198 .......0g..&.... 0x0010: 0806 0001 0800 0604 0001 0030 679d 8f26 ...........0g..& 0x0020: 0a0b 1335 0000 0000 0000 0a0b 1336 0000 ...5.........6.. 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ................ 23:26:56.842630 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.51 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 0x0000: ffff ffff ffff 0006 4f76 9695 8100 0198 ........Ov...... 0x0010: 0806 0001 0800 0604 0001 0006 4f76 9695 ............Ov.. 0x0020: 0a0b 1334 0000 0000 0000 0a0b 1333 0000 ...4.........3.. 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ 23:26:57.841018 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.51 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 0x0000: ffff ffff ffff 0006 4f76 9695 8100 0198 ........Ov...... 0x0010: 0806 0001 0800 0604 0001 0006 4f76 9695 ............Ov.. 0x0020: 0a0b 1334 0000 0000 0000 0a0b 1333 0000 ...4.........3.. 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ 23:26:58.841126 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.51 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 0x0000: ffff ffff ffff 0006 4f76 9695 8100 0198 ........Ov...... 0x0010: 0806 0001 0800 0604 0001 0006 4f76 9695 ............Ov.. 0x0020: 0a0b 1334 0000 0000 0000 0a0b 1333 0000 ...4.........3.. 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ 23:27:00.558844 ARP, Request who-has 10.11.19.50 tell 10.11.19.52, length 42 0x0000: ffff ffff ffff 0006 4f76 9695 8100 0198 ........Ov...... 0x0010: 0806 0001 0800 0604 0001 0006 4f76 9695 ............Ov.. 0x0020: 0a0b 1334 0000 0000 0000 0a0b 1332 0000 ...4.........2.. 0x0030: 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 ............ reboot system after reboot traffice flows in normal way.
On Tue, Jan 03, 2012 at 09:52:50PM +0000, Eugen Konkov wrote: E> FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #1: Wed Dec 28 15:40:29 EET 2011 @:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/KES_KERN_v9 i386 What FreeBSD version are you running? As of Dec 28 2011, the 9 branch stored in stable/9 svn branch should be named 9.0-PRERELEASE, and the head/ branch is named 10.0-CURRENT. The perfect answer would be name of svn branch and revision are you running. However, CVS tag and date would also work. -- Totus tuus, Glebius.
I'm seeing similar behavior on 9.0-RELEASE as well... wf048# tcpdump -n -i cxgb1.190 arp tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on cxgb1.190, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 65535 bytes 20:10:04.622312 ARP, Reply 10.7.190.126 is-at 14:fe:b5:d0:c8:25, length 46 20:10:04.804766 ARP, Reply 10.7.190.132 is-at 14:fe:b5:d1:80:39, length 46 20:10:05.791876 ARP, Request who-has 10.52.0.3 tell 10.52.190.15, length 46 20:10:06.791970 ARP, Request who-has 10.52.0.3 tell 10.52.190.15, length 46 20:10:07.791939 ARP, Request who-has 10.52.0.3 tell 10.52.190.15, length 46 20:10:09.797397 ARP, Reply 10.7.190.187 is-at 84:2b:2b:6d:32:d6, length 46 20:10:10.792135 ARP, Request who-has 10.52.0.3 tell 10.52.190.15, length 46 20:10:11.768708 ARP, Request who-has 10.7.190.26 tell 10.7.190.210, length 46 20:10:11.792195 ARP, Request who-has 10.52.0.3 tell 10.52.190.15, length 46 20:10:12.792233 ARP, Request who-has 10.52.0.3 tell 10.52.190.15, length 46 20:10:13.984306 ARP, Request who-has 10.7.190.241 tell 10.7.190.1, length 46 20:10:14.275655 ARP, Reply 192.168.0.120 is-at 14:fe:b5:da:e2:07, length 46 20:10:15.792415 ARP, Request who-has 10.52.0.3 tell 10.52.190.15, length 46 ^C 13 packets captured 56 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel wf048# uname -a FreeBSD wf048.west.isilon.com 9.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE #0: Tue Jan 3 07:46:30 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 ... but not 7.4-RELEASE... # tcpdump -n -i cxgb0.190 arp tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on cxgb0.190, link-type EN10MB (Ethernet), capture size 96 bytes ^C 0 packets captured 0 packets received by filter 0 packets dropped by kernel Is vlan traffic broken on 9.x+? I need to do more digging in 9.1-PRERELEASE/10-CURRENT. Thanks! -Garrett
Hi, I stumbled across this PR the other day - having a similar issue setting up VLANs under 10.x in this case. After much head scratching I found, for example on a freshly installed, run up FBSD 10.x box: ifconfig bge1.100 create ifconfig bge1.100 192.168.0.20 netmask 255.255.255.0 [and equivalent on the other side] Doesn't work - you see ARP requests flying around - but no traffic is exchanged. However, doing: ifconfig bge1 up (i.e. Bringing up the 'parent' / underlying NIC on both machines) After a few seconds - everything 'works', and traffic does flow over the VLAN (i.e. ARP requests are answered etc.) Whether this is the same issue, whether it's a "bug" that the interface isn't brought 'up' when the vlan virtual interface is created - who knows. Similar thing happens for LAGG interfaces - unless you have a dummy: ifconfig_bge1="UP" In /etc/rc.conf - LAGG configs don't work either. Anyway, just thought I'd post a followup to this - incase this 'fixes' (or at least sheds light) on the original issue. -Karl
(In reply to karl from comment #3) I think this is intended behavior but I'd let someone from the list confirm and close the bug in that case. If not, someone needs to test -CURRENT or 11 for this bug.
batch change: For bugs that match the following - Status Is In progress AND - Untouched since 2018-01-01. AND - Affects Base System OR Documentation DO: Reset to open status. Note: I did a quick pass but if you are getting this email it might be worthwhile to double check to see if this bug ought to be closed.