portupgrade on libbluray-0.2.20110219 fails http://paste.pocoo.org/show/556051/ How-To-Repeat: Install or upgrade multimedia/libbluray
Maintainer of multimedia/libbluray, Please note that PR ports/165449 has just been submitted. If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch and a committer will take care of it. The full text of the PR can be found at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/165449 -- Edwin Groothuis via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool edwin@FreeBSD.org
State Changed From-To: open->feedback Awaiting maintainers feedback (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->rm I will take it.
The workaround is to disable java support (default). I'll investigate further. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
There's a bug in the packaging of 0.2.1. I have a fix, but it adds a 1M shar to the files directory. I need some webspace to host the missing sources. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Kurt Jaeger has provided me with webspace. The patch is attached, ports/166223 is a prerequisite http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=166223 Apply with patch -E, it removes a file. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Hi, Dominic! Dominic Fandrey wrote on 17.03.2012 23:00: > The following reply was made to PR ports/165449; it has been noted by GNATS. > > From: Dominic Fandrey<kamikaze@bsdforen.de> > To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd.users@gmail.com > Cc: > Subject: Re: ports/165449: portupgrade on multimedia/libbluray fails > Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 19:56:19 +0100 > > There's a bug in the packaging of 0.2.1. I have a fix, but it adds > a 1M shar to the files directory. I need some webspace to host the > missing sources. I'm sorry for delay. I seems missing the point of problem. Would you please provide some details about what is broken in packaging? Does it have any relation to original breakage report (that's java related imho)? What the reason to host use self-made (?) distfile, not official videolan's one? Thanks. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
On 19/03/2012 11:28, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote on 17.03.2012 23:00: >> There's a bug in the packaging of 0.2.1. I have a fix, but it adds >> a 1M shar to the files directory. I need some webspace to host the >> missing sources. > > I'm sorry for delay. I seems missing the point of problem. > Would you please provide some details about what is broken in packaging? Does it have any relation to original breakage report (that's java related imho)? What the reason to host use self-made (?) distfile, not official videolan's one? Thanks. Most of the sources needed to build BDJ are missing: - src/libbluray/bdj/java/ containing 548 files - src/libbluray/bdj/build.xml There's a mail somewhere on the libbluray mailing list about it. By the way, libbluray 0.2.2 has just been tagged: http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/libbluray.git/?a=commit;h=6181d501568f41266fb1a07be37f22672e3b3121 At the time of writing, no distfiles are available, though. I expect it within the week though and will provide a proper patch. Regards -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Dominic Fandrey wrote on 19.03.2012 15:28: > Most of the sources needed to build BDJ are missing: > - src/libbluray/bdj/java/ containing 548 files > - src/libbluray/bdj/build.xml > > There's a mail somewhere on the libbluray mailing list about it. > > By the way, libbluray 0.2.2 has just been tagged: > http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/libbluray.git/?a=commit;h=6181d501568f41266fb1a07be37f22672e3b3121 > > > At the time of writing, no distfiles are available, though. I > expect it within the week though and will provide a proper patch. > > Regards Ok, so I'd prefer to wait for 0.2.2 because it seems to be soon and java isn't default anyway. Am I right that missing java-related files are now included into official 0.2.2 (I didn't checked git repo)? -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
On 19/03/2012 13:08, Ruslan Mahmatkhanov wrote: > Dominic Fandrey wrote on 19.03.2012 15:28: >> Most of the sources needed to build BDJ are missing: >> - src/libbluray/bdj/java/ containing 548 files >> - src/libbluray/bdj/build.xml >> >> There's a mail somewhere on the libbluray mailing list about it. >> >> By the way, libbluray 0.2.2 has just been tagged: >> http://git.videolan.org/gitweb.cgi/libbluray.git/?a=commit;h=6181d501568f41266fb1a07be37f22672e3b3121 >> >> >> At the time of writing, no distfiles are available, though. I >> expect it within the week though and will provide a proper patch. >> >> Regards > > Ok, so I'd prefer to wait for 0.2.2 because it seems to be soon and java isn't default anyway. Am I right that missing java-related files are now included into official 0.2.2 (I didn't checked git repo)? They were in the repo for 0.2.1, too. Just not in the the tar. -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Ladies and genlemen, I proudly present, libbluray 0.2.2. It /still/ depends on ports/166223 and it still should be applied with "patch -E". Along the way, let's update some dependencies on the way. Am I the only one finding it ironic that vlc comes without libbluray support in the ports? -- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
Dominic Fandrey wrote on 21.03.2012 02:40: > Ladies and genlemen, I proudly present, libbluray 0.2.2. > > It /still/ depends on ports/166223 and it still should be applied with > "patch -E". Dominic, please let's wait a little for libbluray upstream response (I added you to cc: ). > > Along the way, let's update some dependencies on the way. > > Am I the only one finding it ironic that vlc comes without libbluray > support in the ports? I'd suggest that you open new pr with request for adding lubbluray dependency to multimedia/vlc, so that Joseph will be aware about this. -- Regards, Ruslan Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
rm 2012-03-22 06:52:34 UTC FreeBSD ports repository Modified files: multimedia/libbluray Makefile distinfo pkg-plist multimedia/libxine Makefile multimedia/mplayer Makefile.options multimedia/vdr-plugin-xineliboutput Makefile multimedia/xbmc Makefile multimedia/xbmc-pvr Makefile Removed files: multimedia/libbluray/files patch-configure.ac Log: - update to 0.2.2 - chase shlib bump in dependent ports - bump PORTREVISION for xbmc and xbmc-pvr Please note that this commit isn't actually feature safe, because it bumps portrevision for two (not that small) ports. But it fixes the breakage, reported in PR, and, as side effect, raises library version. PR: 165449 Reported by: Justin <freebsd.users at gmail dot com> Submitted by: Dominic Fandrey <kamikaze at bsdforen dot de> (maintainer) Feature safe: yes Revision Changes Path 1.3 +4 -4 ports/multimedia/libbluray/Makefile 1.3 +2 -2 ports/multimedia/libbluray/distinfo 1.3 +0 -11 ports/multimedia/libbluray/files/patch-configure.ac (dead) 1.3 +1 -1 ports/multimedia/libbluray/pkg-plist 1.181 +1 -1 ports/multimedia/libxine/Makefile 1.30 +2 -2 ports/multimedia/mplayer/Makefile.options 1.13 +1 -1 ports/multimedia/vdr-plugin-xineliboutput/Makefile 1.12 +2 -1 ports/multimedia/xbmc-pvr/Makefile 1.23 +2 -1 ports/multimedia/xbmc/Makefile _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
State Changed From-To: feedback->closed Committed, thank you!