- Update to 1.5.5
Generated with FreeBSD Port Tools 0.99_6 (mode: update, diff: suffix)
I'll take it.
thanks for your update on py-ranger. However, when I try your patch I get
a checksum issue which prevents me from installing the port.
See for example the following log:
I have tried the install twice and always came up with the same issue.
Could you please have a look at it?
Thanks for figuring out this issue, there is also the same issue of
py-ranger 1.5.4 but I still don't know why.
I've download tar ball from
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/ranger.git/refs/ last night but this
morning it has different checksum.
Or maybe I should find another tar ball site?
2012/8/22 Frederic Culot <email@example.com>
> Hi Jin-Sih,
> thanks for your update on py-ranger. However, when I try your patch I get
> a checksum issue which prevents me from installing the port.
> See for example the following log:
> I have tried the install twice and always came up with the same issue.
> Could you please have a look at it?
> Many thanks,
> Frederic (culot@)
Daniel Lin (pct)
I am currently in the process of updating the FreeBSD port for ranger ,
but unfortunately I bumped into an issue with the checksum of the archive
that is provided on .
Indeed, when downloading ranger-1.5.5.tar.gz yesterday the SHA256 sum for
this archive was different from the one we have today, despite the fact
that the size of the archive did not change.
As we are very cautious with security issues, I wanted to check with you
the reasons why the checksum for the archive changed. Were there any
modifications on your side leading to this or could it be the result of
a compromised archive?
Thanks for your clarification Roman!
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:02:44AM +0000, Frederic Culot wrote:
> Hi Roman,
> I am currently in the process of updating the FreeBSD port for ranger ,
> but unfortunately I bumped into an issue with the checksum of the archive
> that is provided on .
> Indeed, when downloading ranger-1.5.5.tar.gz yesterday the SHA256 sum for
> this archive was different from the one we have today, despite the fact
> that the size of the archive did not change.
> As we are very cautious with security issues, I wanted to check with you
> the reasons why the checksum for the archive changed. Were there any
> modifications on your side leading to this or could it be the result of
> a compromised archive?
> Thanks for your clarification Roman!
>  http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/170820
>  http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/ranger.git/snapshot/
I didn't change the snapshot. The software must have rebuilt it for
some reason, changing the hash in the process. I checked the snapshot 
with the sha256sum  and it is legitimate.
To avoid this issue in the future, there are now static, signed
snapshots since version 1.2.2 on the website .
Date: Thu Aug 23 06:48:09 2012
New Revision: 302980
- Update to 1.5.5
- Update MASTER_SITES
Submitted by: Jin-Sih Lin <firstname.lastname@example.org> (maintainer)
--- head/sysutils/py-ranger/Makefile Thu Aug 23 04:49:36 2012 (r302979)
+++ head/sysutils/py-ranger/Makefile Thu Aug 23 06:48:09 2012 (r302980)
@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@
CATEGORIES= sysutils python
--- head/sysutils/py-ranger/distinfo Thu Aug 23 04:49:36 2012 (r302979)
+++ head/sysutils/py-ranger/distinfo Thu Aug 23 06:48:09 2012 (r302980)
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (ranger-1.5.4.tar.gz) = 9cc9bc1c5842c93b7546c6f4906b5312c32715ed55344e5154b268baeef1c9fc
-SIZE (ranger-1.5.4.tar.gz) = 126651
+SHA256 (ranger-1.5.5.tar.gz) = 7445e00ee84055982df2b8511672923db778b9ee24b606beb61d084b38baa9d3
+SIZE (ranger-1.5.5.tar.gz) = 126769
email@example.com mailing list
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "firstname.lastname@example.org"
Committed. Thanks for your help Jin-Sih!