Software : virtualbox-ose-4.1.22 A general-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.1.22 VirtualBox kernel module for FreeBSD Host : FreeBSD 9.1-PRE AMD64 Guest : Windows XP SP2 32Bit When i try to use bridging with my wlan0 or em0 in VirtualBox my guest netcard can assign address. Setting static addresses dont resolv that problem. I see, that packages send increase but recived packages are all the time 0. I try to set Promiscuous mode to : Allow ALL / Allow VMs, without luck. How-To-Repeat: Try to use bridging in VirtualMachine
Sorry, why that link don't work ? Best regards, Adrian. W dniu 2012-11-17 00:50, FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org napisaÅ(a): > Thank you very much for your problem report. > It has the internal identification `misc/173672'. > The individual assigned to look at your > report is: freebsd-bugs. > > You can access the state of your problem report at any time > via this link: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=173672 > >>Category: misc >>Responsible: freebsd-bugs >>Synopsis: VirtualBox and bridge problem. >>Arrival-Date: Fri Nov 16 23:50:00 UTC 2012 -- Pozdrawiam, Huryn Adrian.
On 19 November 2012 07:57, Huryn Adrian <ahuryn@i-pi.pl> wrote: > Sorry, why that link don't work ? That gnats web interface is a bit behind. The bug report made it through. -- Eitan Adler
Hello, i can't find that report? Link don't work. Regards. W dniu 2012-11-19 14:47, Eitan Adler napisaÅ(a): > On 19 November 2012 07:57, Huryn Adrian <ahuryn@i-pi.pl> wrote: >> Sorry, why that link don't work ? > > That gnats web interface is a bit behind. The bug report made it > through. -- Pozdrawiam, Huryn Adrian.
Responsible Changed From-To: freebsd-bugs->vbox Assign to VirtualBox alias
Could you please provide output of 'ngctl list' command? I think that your problem might be related to this issue: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net/37802/focus=37807 -- Andriy Gapon
W dniu 2012-12-13 23:39, Andriy Gapon napisaÅ(a): > Could you please provide output of 'ngctl list' command? > I think that your problem might be related to this issue: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net/37802/focus=37807 [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ sudo ngctl list There are 11 total nodes: Name: em0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 0 Name: btsock_hci_raw Type: btsock_hci_raw ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 1 Name: btsock_l2c_raw Type: btsock_l2c_raw ID: 00000005 Num hooks: 1 Name: btsock_l2c Type: btsock_l2c ID: 00000006 Num hooks: 1 Name: btsock_sco Type: btsock_sco ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 0 Name: ubt0 Type: ubt ID: 0000006f Num hooks: 1 Name: wlan0 Type: ether ID: 00000070 Num hooks: 0 Name: ubt0hci Type: hci ID: 00000072 Num hooks: 3 Name: ubt0l2cap Type: l2cap ID: 00000076 Num hooks: 3 Name: ngctl35728 Type: socket ID: 0000007c Num hooks: 0 Name: vboxnet0 Type: ether ID: 0000003f Num hooks: 0 Regards.
on 14/12/2012 11:01 ahuryn@i-pi.pl said the following: > W dniu 2012-12-13 23:39, Andriy Gapon napisaÅ(a): >> Could you please provide output of 'ngctl list' command? >> I think that your problem might be related to this issue: >> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net/37802/focus=37807 > [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ sudo ngctl list > There are 11 total nodes: > Name: em0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 0 > Name: btsock_hci_raw Type: btsock_hci_raw ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 1 > Name: btsock_l2c_raw Type: btsock_l2c_raw ID: 00000005 Num hooks: 1 > Name: btsock_l2c Type: btsock_l2c ID: 00000006 Num hooks: 1 > Name: btsock_sco Type: btsock_sco ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 0 > Name: ubt0 Type: ubt ID: 0000006f Num hooks: 1 > Name: wlan0 Type: ether ID: 00000070 Num hooks: 0 > Name: ubt0hci Type: hci ID: 00000072 Num hooks: 3 > Name: ubt0l2cap Type: l2cap ID: 00000076 Num hooks: 3 > Name: ngctl35728 Type: socket ID: 0000007c Num hooks: 0 > Name: vboxnet0 Type: ether ID: 0000003f Num hooks: 0 Were you running a VM when capturing the above output? I expected to see "Type: vboxnetflt" in the output. Which instructions do you follow for configuring bridge mode? Have you enabled vboxnet* drivers? -- Andriy Gapon
Hello. YOu have right ;) i forget to run VBox. [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ sudo ngctl list There are 12 total nodes: Name: em0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 0 Name: wlan0 Type: ether ID: 00000002 Num hooks: 2 Name: ubt0 Type: ubt ID: 00000003 Num hooks: 1 Name: btsock_hci_raw Type: btsock_hci_raw ID: 00000004 Num hooks: 1 Name: btsock_l2c_raw Type: btsock_l2c_raw ID: 00000005 Num hooks: 1 Name: btsock_l2c Type: btsock_l2c ID: 00000006 Num hooks: 1 Name: btsock_sco Type: btsock_sco ID: 00000007 Num hooks: 0 Name: ubt0hci Type: hci ID: 00000009 Num hooks: 3 Name: ubt0l2cap Type: l2cap ID: 0000000d Num hooks: 3 Name: vboxnet0 Type: ether ID: 00000013 Num hooks: 0 Name: vboxnetflt_wlan0 Type: vboxnetflt ID: 00000014 Num hooks: 2 Name: ngctl39612 Type: socket ID: 00000015 Num hooks: 0 [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ cat /etc/rc.conf | grep vb vboxnet_enable="YES" I configure in Virtualbox bridge with promiscuous mode : allow ALL. And that settings previously worked. W dniu 2012-12-14 17:57, Andriy Gapon napisaÅ(a): > on 14/12/2012 11:01 ahuryn@i-pi.pl said the following: >> W dniu 2012-12-13 23:39, Andriy Gapon napisaÅ(a): >>> Could you please provide output of 'ngctl list' command? >>> I think that your problem might be related to this issue: >>> >>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.freebsd.devel.net/37802/focus=37807 >> [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ sudo ngctl list >> There are 11 total nodes: >> Name: em0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num >> hooks: 0 >> Name: btsock_hci_raw Type: btsock_hci_raw ID: 00000004 Num >> hooks: 1 >> Name: btsock_l2c_raw Type: btsock_l2c_raw ID: 00000005 Num >> hooks: 1 >> Name: btsock_l2c Type: btsock_l2c ID: 00000006 Num >> hooks: 1 >> Name: btsock_sco Type: btsock_sco ID: 00000007 Num >> hooks: 0 >> Name: ubt0 Type: ubt ID: 0000006f Num >> hooks: 1 >> Name: wlan0 Type: ether ID: 00000070 Num >> hooks: 0 >> Name: ubt0hci Type: hci ID: 00000072 Num >> hooks: 3 >> Name: ubt0l2cap Type: l2cap ID: 00000076 Num >> hooks: 3 >> Name: ngctl35728 Type: socket ID: 0000007c Num >> hooks: 0 >> Name: vboxnet0 Type: ether ID: 0000003f Num >> hooks: 0 > > Were you running a VM when capturing the above output? > I expected to see "Type: vboxnetflt" in the output. > > Which instructions do you follow for configuring bridge mode? > Have you enabled vboxnet* drivers? -- Pozdrawiam, Huryn Adrian.
on 15/12/2012 22:28 Huryn Adrian said the following: > Hello. > YOu have right ;) i forget to run VBox. > [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ sudo ngctl list > There are 12 total nodes: > Name: em0 Type: ether ID: 00000001 Num hooks: 0 > Name: wlan0 Type: ether ID: 00000002 Num hooks: 2 [snip] > Name: vboxnetflt_wlan0 Type: vboxnetflt ID: 00000014 Num hooks: 2 > Name: ngctl39612 Type: socket ID: 00000015 Num hooks: 0 > > [cr4sh@x300 ~]$ cat /etc/rc.conf | grep vb > vboxnet_enable="YES" Hmm, looks like netgraph level connections are correctly established between wlan0 and vboxnetflt_wlan0. So I am out of ideas, sorry. -- Andriy Gapon
Is this PR still relevant? Back to pool.
(In reply to Carlo Strub from comment #10) > Is this PR still relevant? Back to pool. Yes, I still have a problem in the virtual machine does not "see" the master host, if the network card is configured as a bridge and a master host system has any other bridge. uname -a FreeBSD nonamehost.local 10.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.1-PRERELEASE #0 r273931: Sat Nov 1 17:08:45 EET 2014 ivan@nonamehost.local:/media/da0s1/obj/usr/src/sys/mk10 amd64 virtualbox-ose-4.3.18 General-purpose full virtualizer for x86 hardware virtualbox-ose-kmod-4.3.18 VirtualBox kernel module for FreeBSD # ifconfig ath0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 2290 ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect <hostap>) status: no carrier re0: flags=8943<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 options=82099<RXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx inet 192.168.0.238 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: Ethernet autoselect <flowcontrol> (100baseTX <full-duplex,flowcontrol,rxpause,txpause>) status: active pflog0: flags=141<UP,RUNNING,PROMISC> metric 0 mtu 33160 pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1500 syncpeer: 0.0.0.0 maxupd: 128 defer: off lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384 options=600003<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,RXCSUM_IPV6,TXCSUM_IPV6> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=21<PERFORMNUD,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> bridge0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 02:ac:22:d8:fe:00 inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 nd6 options=9<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED> id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 hellotime 2 fwddelay 15 maxage 20 holdcnt 6 proto rstp maxaddr 2000 timeout 1200 root id 00:00:00:00:00:00 priority 32768 ifcost 0 port 0 member: re0 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> ifmaxaddr 0 port 2 priority 128 path cost 200000 member: wlan0 flags=143<LEARNING,DISCOVER,AUTOEDGE,AUTOPTP> ifmaxaddr 0 port 7 priority 128 path cost 66666 wlan0: flags=8902<BROADCAST,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 ether xx:xx:xx:xx:xx:xx nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g <hostap> status: no carrier ssid xxxxxwlan channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) regdomain 96 indoor ecm authmode AUTO privacy OFF deftxkey 2 txpower 20 scanvalid 60 protmode CTS wme burst dtimperiod 1 -dfs
Back to maintainer.
This bug affects me too. # uname -a FreeBSD zippi 10.1-BETA3 FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 #0 r272167: Fri Sep 26 11:11:24 UTC 2014 root@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 # pkg info virtualbox-ose | head virtualbox-ose-4.3.12_2 Name : virtualbox-ose Version : 4.3.12_2 Installed on : Fri Oct 3 14:41:11 CEST 2014 Origin : emulators/virtualbox-ose Architecture : freebsd:10:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : emulators Licenses : GPLv2 Maintainer : vbox@FreeBSD.org
Three years gone without reply. Is this still a problem on recent FreeBSD-versions? Or can this PR closed?
Closing one year after comment #14.