Looks like FreeBSD has lib/21691: sscanf_neghex: [0.001912s] Failed: /usr/src/lib/libc/tests/stdio/t_scanf.c:50: i == NUM not met The snippet of test code that exhibits this is: #define NUM -0x1234 #define STRNUM __STRING(NUM) ATF_TC(sscanf_neghex); ATF_TC_HEAD(sscanf_neghex, tc) { atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", "PR lib/21691: %%i and %%x fail with negative hex numbers"); } ATF_TC_BODY(sscanf_neghex, tc) { int i; sscanf(STRNUM, "%i", &i); ATF_REQUIRE(i == NUM); sscanf(STRNUM, "%x", &i); ATF_REQUIRE(i == NUM); }
On 09.08.2013 4:15, Garrett Cooper wrote: > #define NUM -0x1234 > #define STRNUM __STRING(NUM) > > ATF_TC(sscanf_neghex); > ATF_TC_HEAD(sscanf_neghex, tc) > { > atf_tc_set_md_var(tc, "descr", > "PR lib/21691: %%i and %%x fail with negative hex numbers"); > } > > ATF_TC_BODY(sscanf_neghex, tc) > { > int i; > > sscanf(STRNUM, "%i", &i); > ATF_REQUIRE(i == NUM); > > sscanf(STRNUM, "%x", &i); > ATF_REQUIRE(i == NUM); > } Probably something is wrong with your ATF way, this example works: #include <stdio.h> int main() { int i; i = 0; sscanf("-0x1234", "%i", &i); printf("%d\n", i); i = 0; sscanf("-0x1234", "%x", &i); printf("%d\n", i); } -4660 -4660 (which is -0x1234) Please do not post more ATF examples, use plain ones, many developers (including me) don't have ATF installed. -- http://ache.vniz.net/ bitcoin:1G6ugdNY6e5jx1GVnAU2ntj2NEfmjKG85r
For bugs matching the following criteria: Status: In Progress Changed: (is less than) 2014-06-01 Reset to default assignee and clear in-progress tags. Mail being skipped