Bug 181450 - [new port] revive port www/linux-f10-flashplugin10, becase it's last version for processor without SSE2
Summary: [new port] revive port www/linux-f10-flashplugin10, becase it's last version ...
Status: Closed Not Accepted
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: Normal Affects Some People
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody)
URL:
Keywords:
: 180766 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2013-08-21 10:00 UTC by sasamotikomi
Modified: 2017-12-19 12:26 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description sasamotikomi 2013-08-21 10:00:00 UTC 
www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 request SSE2 and not work with old processor:
https://bugbase.adobe.com/index.cfm?event=bug&id=3161034
It's all:
AMD processor before Athlon 64(all not x86-64)
Intel processor before Pentium 4

Fix: 

Update www/linux-f10-flashplugin10 to last secure path version  10.3.183.90 http://helpx.adobe.com/flash-player/kb/archived-flash-player-versions.html
And mark www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 how ignore.
How-To-Repeat: Install www/linux-f10-flashplugin11 on any machine with CPU without SSE2
Comment 1 Eitan Adler freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2014-06-29 01:28:55 UTC 
*** Bug 180766 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Eitan Adler freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2014-06-29 01:32:03 UTC 
10.3.183.90 is not receiving security updates: it would not be wise to add a new port which is perpetually marked as FORBIDDEN.
Comment 3 commit-hook freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2017-12-19 12:26:35 UTC 
A commit references this bug:

Author: se
Date: Tue Dec 19 12:25:35 UTC 2017
New revision: 456715
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/456715

Log:
  Add back local package installation support, which was disabled for PKG_NG.
  The patch attached to PR 181450 did no longer apply cleanly, therefore I
  edited portmaster to follow the intent and in part the letter of the patch.
  This patch should not affect port building in any way. I have no use for
  the feature (and I'm still considering to completely remove support for the
  installation of packages in portmaster), and therefore did not test that
  it performs as expected by the submitter.

  PR:		181450
  Submitted by:	rozhuk.im@gmail.com
  Approved by:	antoine (implicit)

Changes:
  head/ports-mgmt/portmaster/Makefile
  head/ports-mgmt/portmaster/files/patch-portmaster