Created attachment 146110 [details] patch Patch to stage/update apertium. Which also needs the lttoolbox update, so it's included. Maintainer of lttoolbox has to to approve.
Kurt (submitter), you'll have to regenerate your patch based on the work on committed bug 192807 so that Kurt (committer) can apply it. :)
Created attachment 146120 [details] patch, redone New patch, same goal 8-)
Just commit this today. All unstaged ports are getting marked at least broken tomorrow if not outright removed. There's no more time to wait. And you don't need approval for staging anyway. It's a blanket permission.
A commit references this bug: Author: pi Date: Sun Aug 31 11:01:06 UTC 2014 New revision: 366744 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/366744 Log: textproc/lttoolbox, textproc/apertium: 3.2.0 -> 3.3.0 - lttoolbox -has two new tools: lt-trim and lt-print - apertium has a new deformatter: apertium-deslatex - lextor is deprecated, the code is still there but is not built - apertium has a new m4 macro that supports using language packages from /languages/ PR: 192886 Changes: head/textproc/apertium/Makefile head/textproc/apertium/distinfo head/textproc/apertium/files/ head/textproc/apertium/pkg-plist head/textproc/lttoolbox/Makefile head/textproc/lttoolbox/distinfo head/textproc/lttoolbox/pkg-plist
Update committed.
(In reply to John Marino from comment #3) > Just commit this today. All unstaged ports are getting marked at least > broken tomorrow if not outright removed. There's no more time to wait. > > And you don't need approval for staging anyway. It's a blanket permission. lttoolbox was already staged, and apertium was staged by 192807, so according to the rules I had to wait for lttoolbox-maintainer approval, no ?
I got lost in all what was trying to be accomplished. The original title said "staged" so I thought it was still a staging PR. In any case, a couple of weeks have passed and maintainer didn't say anything, so it timed out anyway.