Created attachment 147208 [details] graphics/dcraw-m UN break the port graphics/dcraw-m I use this port, and had already had the source. I'm happy to host it. So here's a diff that should restore it. replaces MASTER_SITES changes distinfo FWIW Feel free to put me as MAINTAINER, should the current one be un(willing|able) Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris
(In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #0) > Created attachment 147208 [details] > graphics/dcraw-m UN break the port > > graphics/dcraw-m > > I use this port, and had already had the source. > I'm happy to host it. So here's a diff that should restore it. > > replaces MASTER_SITES > changes distinfo > > FWIW Feel free to put me as MAINTAINER, should the current one > be un(willing|able) > > Thank you for all your time, and consideration. > > --Chris P.S. Should probably also mention; did NOT bump PORTREVISION
It seems the distfile was rerolled, why? this is bad practice.
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #2) > It seems the distfile was rerolled, why? this is bad practice. Sure. But since I'm the new source for the port, and given it's otherwise being broken. This effectively makes it a new port. Does re-rolling it really matter? Maybe a "port" revision bump is needed? Thanks for all your time, and consideration. --Chris
Yes, it matters. The port is getting removed in less than a month too. If you care, bump the PORTREVISION and explain what the changes were. How else are you going to convince people this is not a tampered-with distfile?
Created attachment 148958 [details] make fetchable, repack, bump PORTREVISION Here is a revised version (replaces previous) that takes into account for all the comments the first diff(1) generated; * repacked source to remain consistent with the other source I host (the original source remains UNCHANGED) which necessitates PORTREVISION bump * UNbreak port (it now becomes fetchable) Hope this addresses all the currently outstanding issues. :) --Chris
(In reply to C Hutchinson from comment #5) > Created attachment 148958 [details] > make fetchable, repack, bump PORTREVISION > > Here is a revised version (replaces previous) that takes into > account for all the comments the first diff(1) generated; > > * repacked source to remain consistent with the other > source I host (the original source remains UNCHANGED) > which necessitates PORTREVISION bump > > * UNbreak port (it now becomes fetchable) > > Hope this addresses all the currently outstanding issues. :) > > --Chris All of this is now moot. Maintainer opened a new pr(1): https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=194775 Please mark this closed. --Chris
withdrawn