Bug 194646 - [maintainer update] devel/ruby-build: update to 20141028
Summary: [maintainer update] devel/ruby-build: update to 20141028
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: Bartek Rutkowski
Depends on:
Reported: 2014-10-28 01:39 UTC by Koichiro Iwao
Modified: 2014-10-30 12:30 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

patch (1.02 KB, patch)
2014-10-28 01:39 UTC, Koichiro Iwao
no flags Details | Diff
20141028 has been released (1.02 KB, patch)
2014-10-30 00:42 UTC, Koichiro Iwao
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2014-10-28 01:39:37 UTC
Created attachment 148721 [details]

subject describes all
Comment 1 Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2014-10-30 00:42:44 UTC
Created attachment 148783 [details]
20141028 has been released
Comment 2 commit-hook freebsd_committer 2014-10-30 09:37:56 UTC
A commit references this bug:

Author: robak
Date: Thu Oct 30 09:37:24 UTC 2014
New revision: 371728
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/371728

  devel/ruby-build: update 20140926 -> 20141028

  PR:		194646
  Submitted by:	Koichiro Iwao <meta+ports@vmeta.jp>
  Approved by:	mentors (implicit)

Comment 3 Bartek Rutkowski freebsd_committer 2014-10-30 09:44:24 UTC
Committed, thanks for your work! By the way, the next time you'll be sending PR with an update, please, consider correcting the PORTVERSION as described at the bottom of that document: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html
Comment 4 Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2014-10-30 12:19:01 UTC
I just obey ruby-build's versioning.  YYYYMMDD is upstream official version.  Please see tags in repository.
Comment 5 Koichiro Iwao freebsd_committer 2014-10-30 12:30:05 UTC
I meant I'm not using date instead of version number since upstream has no information.  They uses YYYYMMDD as official version number.  Should I have to use 0.0.yyyy.mm.dd in such case?