Created attachment 156592 [details] svn diff for mail/rainloop Update rainloop to 1.9.0 Order PHP modules
Created attachment 156593 [details] Poudriere testport of mail/rainloop 1.9.0
Okay for me for the patch. The only remaining question is: this 1.9.0 introduce two rainloop packages, one is CC and one is AGPLv3. I think we should switch to AGPLv3 version, the package isn't named rainloop-latest but rainloop-community-latest. What do you think about it ?
Looking at http://www.rainloop.net/purchase/ I'd say we should add a LEGAL_TEXT=Commercial use is prohibited to this port and create a mail/rainloop-community AGPL3 version port otherwise we'd be in trouble with the packages. Will ask on irc for direction.
Created attachment 156746 [details] svn diff for mail/rainloop Includes mail/Makefile patch Makes it the master port for mail/rainloop-community (see att shar) Please verify both ports...
Created attachment 156747 [details] shar file for new slave port mail/rainloop-community
Created attachment 156750 [details] svn diff for mail/rainloop Just when you're done, you see a new build. - New patches update to 1.9.0 build 327 - Update to OPTIONS_USE helpers - Pet portlint
Created attachment 156751 [details] shar file for new slave port mail/rainloop-community
Seems good to me
Reporter is committer, assign accordingly.
Maintainer, please set maintainer-approval for each of the attachments, or if you cannot do so, just mention "attachment <id> approved" in a comment for those that you approve.
attachment 156750 [details] approved attachment 156751 [details] approved
Build-Tests on 10.1 (i/a) and 9.3a went fine for both the updated version and the slave port.
Meanwhile later versions have appeared. Should I update the port to latest upstream?
I thinks this is a good idea and we should push those new version faster, we are a little bit late :)
Indeed. 1.9.2 was published. I upgraded my working copy, build-tests @work.
Can you provide a changelog or a link to a changelog since 1.8.x ?
http://www.rainloop.net/changelog/
build-tests on 10.1 i/a, 9.3a went fine.
A commit references this bug: Author: pi Date: Mon Jul 6 17:24:12 UTC 2015 New revision: 391428 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/391428 Log: mail/rainloop: Upgrade 1.8.2 -> 1.9.2 mail/rainloop-community: new slave port, community edition rainloop is a modern and interactive webmail. Changelog since 1.8.2: http://www.rainloop.net/changelog/ PR: 200091 Submitted by: brnrd Approved by: loic.blot@unix-experience.fr (maintainer) Changes: head/mail/Makefile head/mail/rainloop/Makefile head/mail/rainloop/distinfo head/mail/rainloop/pkg-plist head/mail/rainloop-community/ head/mail/rainloop-community/Makefile head/mail/rainloop-community/distinfo head/mail/rainloop-community/pkg-descr head/mail/rainloop-community/pkg-plist
Committed, thanks!
A commit references this bug: Author: pi Date: Mon Jul 6 21:00:34 UTC 2015 New revision: 391479 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/391479 Log: mail/rainloop: fix typo in PGSQL_USE PR: 200091 Changes: head/mail/rainloop/Makefile