As the title says: 0.15.1 is available, and has some extra features.
diff --git a/security/py-openssl/Makefile b/security/py-openssl/Makefile
index 17822bb..094503d 100644
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
CATEGORIES= security python
diff --git a/security/py-openssl/distinfo b/security/py-openssl/distinfo
index 0394add..31c4bc2 100644
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-SHA256 (pyOpenSSL-0.14.tar.gz) = a99db8e59c120138ad8a72eecedcc24b4510d2eed3ce48213b7e32f22cc4ee6e
-SIZE (pyOpenSSL-0.14.tar.gz) = 128005
+SHA256 (pyOpenSSL-0.15.1.tar.gz) = f0a26070d6db0881de8bcc7846934b7c3c930d8f9c79d45883ee48984bc0d672
+SIZE (pyOpenSSL-0.15.1.tar.gz) = 149887
Can you include your diff as an attachment please and include QA results (poudriere, portlint, regression-test) if possible
Created attachment 157192 [details]
The same diffs in the description
I built a release here, which did involve poudriere, but I have no strong regression tests, since I don't maintain the port.
I painstakingly cut & paste the text from the previous description into a file which I've attached.
Add a smiley face there ;).
Thank you Sef, you'll note there's a regression-test target in the py-openssl Makefile which will do the correct thing :)
If you could attach the poudriere log you built with that would be great
Oooh. Didn't know about the regression test.
Log file from poudriere being attached. Pardon typos in this, I drove home with the top down and my fingers are a bit stiff.
Created attachment 157194 [details]
Change committed as approved by maintainer timeout, thanks for your submission!
A commit references this bug:
Date: Wed Jun 17 00:09:40 UTC 2015
New revision: 389892
Update to 0.15.1.
Submitted by: sef
Approved by: maintainer timeout