Bug 201763 - Tracking bug for AArch64 port build failures
Summary: Tracking bug for AArch64 port build failures
Status: In Progress
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: arm64 Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: Andrew Turner
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on: 214864 229710 230442 237440 201425 201758 201759 201760 201762 202159 202161 202162 204281 208176 212308 212312 212483 212512 213860 213861 213862 213863 213864 213865 213866 213867 214380 214553 214556 216045 216377 216473 216798 218198 218494 218519 218547 219110 219112 219352 219406 220008 220282 220291 220484 223009 223016 223843 224441 225326 225600 226418 228699 228734 228892 229057 229224 229262 229636 229723 229724 229725 229726 229728 229729 229730 229731 229732 229737 229739 230019 230043 230116 230117 230411 230438 230478 230485 231443 232311 233033 237439 238079
Blocks: 203349 231027
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2015-07-22 15:41 UTC by Andrew Turner
Modified: 2019-05-29 23:19 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
koobs: merge-quarterly?


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andrew Turner freebsd_committer 2015-07-22 15:41:12 UTC

    
Comment 1 Kubilay Kocak freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2015-11-27 03:24:23 UTC
@Ed/Andrew, can one of you assign yourselves to this issue please

Also worth noting whether/that these dependent port fixes should be MFH'd
Comment 2 Ed Maste freebsd_committer 2016-09-02 13:42:03 UTC
While looking at an arm64 objdump issue (PR 212308) I took a look at the top 50 or so failing ports by # of downstream skipped packages.

While looking at that, I noticed that the following ports that failed due to no sbrk:

devel/libgtop
devel/rvm
graphics/graphviz
lang/gauche
sysutils/bacula-client
sysutils/bacula5-client
sysutils/bareos-client
Comment 3 Mark Linimon freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2017-01-31 04:56:37 UTC
See https://wiki.freebsd.org/arm64/ports#Missing_sbrk for the ports that have been marked BROKEN due to missing sbrk.  Note that graphics/graphviz has been fixed for missing sbrk; see https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/graphics/graphviz/files/patch-lib-vmalloc-vmhdr.h?view=markup&pathrev=426075 .
Comment 4 Jan Beich freebsd_committer 2018-05-17 12:49:34 UTC
Does the project plan to acquire another ports/ building box? thunderx1 is oversubscribed: -CURRENT builds are often weeks/months out of date and unnecessarily delay /latest updates for -RELEASE; full builds often crash. This makes QAing port fixes, finding regressions and figuring out remaining bustage harder.

When pkg-fallout@ mail will be enabled by default? Increasing buy-in from maintainers maybe necessary before promoting to Tier1 e.g.,
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2017-July/109503.html
linimion@ does a tremendous job of classifying bustage via BROKEN lines but there're many mistakes, spoiling the effort and adding to the burnout. And I no longer have time to analyze/fix bustage in ports that don't matter to me (only ~100 ports are on my radar). Contributors with actual aarch64 hardware are still rare, so few notice how much bustage is left.