Created attachment 163198 [details]
This patch was removed when updating to 1.6.4, so the patch needs to be put back in order to solve the bug 204399.
Carlos can you please confirm this passes QA
Should this go upstream?
Is there a root cause fix that can be made in KeePass?
(In reply to Kubilay Kocak from comment #1)
Testing@work via poudriere. As to whether this patch should go upstream. The answer is yes, it should go upstream. Currently I'm not sure if exists a fix for KeePassX :(
Created attachment 163211 [details]
poudriere testport on 93x32
Created attachment 163212 [details]
poudriere testport on 93x64
Created attachment 163213 [details]
poudriere testport on 10x32
% portlint -ac
WARN: Consider to set DEVELOPER=yes in /etc/make.conf
0 fatal errors and 1 warning found.
This is a tricky one with restoring previous files. The process is similar to re-adding a deleted port . We do this for a clean SVN history and you will need to copy the patch from the revision before it was deleted. For example,
svn cp --parents 'svn+ssh://cpm@repo.FreeBSD.org/ports/head/security/libgcrypt/files/patch-cipher-Makefile.in@400318' files/patch-cipher-Makefile.in
The `svn status` should reflect:
A + files/patch-cipher-Makefile.in
Please update your QA and provide a commit message when you have done so.
Additionally, please provide a reference to the upstream report of the issue so that there is visibility on it being reported.
A commit references this bug:
Date: Sun Nov 22 17:33:05 UTC 2015
New revision: 402237
security/libgcrypt: Re-add missing patch
- This patch was removed when updating to 1.6.4, so the patch needs
to be put back in order to solve the bug 204399.
Submitted by: Carlos J. Puga Medina <email@example.com> (maintainer)
Carlos, please try to push the fix upstream.
(In reply to Kurt Jaeger from comment #10)
Here it is:
Done in rev: 402237
Assign to committer that resolved, Re-open for MFH