Created attachment 164355 [details] svn diff for archivers/zipmix This simply adds an IPv6 host to the list (MASTER_SITES), for those with IPv6 only hookups. That's it! Thanks! --Chris Keywords: simple, easy, trivial, patch, patch-ready
Hello Chris. Thanks for the patch submission. Please set maintainer-approval to + on any patches you create for ports you are maintainer of. This will ensure it comes up in the Maintainer Approved saved search.
I'm curious, why add a subdomain and whole new master site instead of an AAAA record on bsdforge.com?
(In reply to Rodrigo N. Hernandez from comment #1) > Hello Chris. Thanks for the patch submission. Please set maintainer-approval > to + on any patches you create for ports you are maintainer of. This will > ensure it comes up in the Maintainer Approved saved search. Will do. Thanks! I should have remembered to do that, already, sorry. :(
(In reply to Vladimir Krstulja from comment #2) > I'm curious, why add a subdomain and whole new master site instead of an > AAAA record on bsdforge.com? Fair question. I would have asked the same. :) I did that. But I found the web server (Apache) isn't responding correctly. So I'm just going to dump Apache for nginx, where I'll have better control. Thanks Vladimir! --Chris
@Jason, Martin (miwi@) is taking care of all the other changes from Christ that relate to adding this new IPv6 only host to MASTER_SITES for other ports. Perhaps its best if they were all handled by Martin in whatever consistent way they both decide, including this one.
(In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #4) Hi Chris, Did you had a chance to work on that change? - Martin
(In reply to Martin Wilke from comment #6) > (In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #4) > > Hi Chris, > > Did you had a chance to work on that change? > > - Martin Hello, Martin. I'm changing my upstream provider, and getting a larger IP block. I'll have an answer by the end of this week. Thanks! --Chris
(In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #7) Sounds good to me, the for the update.
OK. Getting new upstream makes this addition no longer necessary. I'll close the other related pr(1)'s, as well. Thanks for your time, Martin, and have a Happy New Year! --Chris