Bug 210193 - [NEW PORT] sysutils/splunkforwarder: Send logs to a Splunk server
Summary: [NEW PORT] sysutils/splunkforwarder: Send logs to a Splunk server
Status: Closed Feedback Timeout
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-ports-bugs (Nobody)
URL:
Keywords: feature, patch
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-06-10 18:22 UTC by Andres Montalban
Modified: 2018-08-23 15:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:

Attachments
Initial commit of the Splunk Forwarder port (13.26 KB, text/plain)
2016-06-10 18:22 UTC, Andres Montalban 		no flags Details
Updated COMMENT (13.25 KB, text/plain)
2016-06-13 14:28 UTC, Andres Montalban 		no flags Details
Rewrite of the port to pass poudriere tests (17.52 KB, patch)
2016-06-29 21:47 UTC, Andres Montalban 		no flags Details | Diff
Show Obsolete (2) View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Andres Montalban 2016-06-10 18:22:25 UTC 
Created attachment 171274 [details]
Initial commit of the Splunk Forwarder port
Comment 1 VK freebsd_triage 2016-06-11 14:38:39 UTC 
Thanks for the patch. I'd suggest you perhaps reuse the summary you wrote here and use that as COMMENT for the port, as it is more descriptive and better fitting for the port.
Comment 2 Andres Montalban 2016-06-13 14:28:20 UTC 
Created attachment 171386 [details]
Updated COMMENT

Update COMMENT as recommended by Vladimir Krstulja
Comment 3 Andres Montalban 2016-06-29 21:47:26 UTC 
Created attachment 171959 [details]
Rewrite of the port to pass poudriere tests
Comment 4 Andres Montalban 2016-06-29 21:51:15 UTC 
Hi Vladimir,

I have rewritten this port with lots of fixes, tested with Poudriere and "make stage && make check-plist && make stage-qa && make package".

Since this is my first port from scratch would love to receive some feedback to see how it can be improved.

Thanks!
Comment 5 Walter Schwarzenfeld freebsd_triage 2018-02-03 08:59:55 UTC 
Any news here?
Comment 6 Tobias Kortkamp freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-08-09 12:10:06 UTC 
Is this still relevant after 2 years?

The port has references for FreeBSD 9.3 and 10.1 which are both not supported
anymore.