Bug 212128 - emulators/virtualbox-ose: Default AIO settings break VirtualBox
Summary: emulators/virtualbox-ose: Default AIO settings break VirtualBox
Status: Closed DUPLICATE of bug 168298
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Some People
Assignee: vbox
Depends on:
Reported: 2016-08-25 03:52 UTC by rkoberman
Modified: 2019-04-18 20:06 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

See Also:


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description rkoberman 2016-08-25 03:52:21 UTC
On FreeBSD-11 and on older versions using AIO VirtualBox can lose disk access when the disk is heavily loaded.

The symptoms are either the guest locking up with the guest's system "disk" showing continuous access while the host system shows no disk activity or by a crash on the guest.

This can be fixed by adjusting the AIO sysctls to allow added capacity before disk requests are lost.

While I have no fix and this issue has existed for a long time, I suggest that pkg-message have an added warning Here is a first-cut that could use some word-smithing:

If AIO is enabled (always in FreeBSD-11.0 and newer), guests may lose disk access. This can be mitigated by adjusting AIO sysctls as follows:

These lines may be added to /etc/sysctl.conf to make them default.
Comment 1 Jan Bramkamp 2016-08-25 13:54:37 UTC
In-flight AIO requests require kernel resources (threads, kernel memory), because of this the kernel limits the concurrency. This sounds like VirtualBox tries to issue too many AIO requests and ignores the errors. Just increasing the limits to something that doesn't fail on your system with your workload doesn't fix such a but. At best (or worst) it hides the bug. An application is expected to handle temporary AIO errors. Possible strategies include falling back to synchronous IO, retrying the AIO with an exponential backoff or just reporting the temporary error to the next layer.
Comment 2 rkoberman 2016-08-28 19:46:56 UTC
The use of large amounts of KVM by these AIO parameters is a concern tome and I have been testing with more moderate values to see if these make VBox stable.

I have now reduced the two biggest changes to:

So far, after two days of use, my guest system has remained stable.

I should also note that the maximum number of AIO processes is reduced from 32 to 8 which will tend to limit the KVM consumed substantially. I will also be looking at the 10x increase in process lifetime. It is conceivable that this is either critical to working around the problem or is unneeded. Those more familiar with the inner workings of the AIO daemons might have a better idea than I do.

I will continue to adjust parameters, but must do that slowly as it can take some time before the problem pops up depending on disk load (whether from VBox or other activity). I am testing on a older (5 yrs) laptop with an 2.5 GHz Sandy Bridge i5 CPU and standard HGST disk 1TB disk, so disk I/O will not be impressive.
Comment 3 rkoberman 2016-09-26 19:10:41 UTC
I am now running with a more conservative set of AIO parameters and have had no problems. N.B. I only run a single instance of Windows 7 or, on rare occasion, Linux Mint, so this might not be appropriate for servers running multiple VMs at the same time.

# From my sysctl.conf                    Default
vfs.aio.max_aio_procs=4                 # (32)
vfs.aio.aiod_lifetime=30000             # (3000)
vfs.aio.max_aio_queue=8192              # (1024)
vfs.aio.max_aio_queue_per_proc=1024     # (256)
vfs.aio.max_aio_per_proc=128            # (32)
vfs.aio.max_buf_aio=64                  # (16) 

I will shortly reduce these further and see how it goes.

This does not preclude the possibility that the modifications to the port could fix this far batter, but I have not had an issue with either kernel memory or error in the VMs with these adjustments.
Comment 4 rkoberman 2017-08-09 04:26:59 UTC
(In reply to rkoberman from comment #3)
11 months and it all remains stable.

Since these parameters have been stable and I have not had issues with exhausting KVM, I'm just leaving it alone although I suspect a couple may still be excessive.
Comment 5 Joseph Mingrone freebsd_committer 2017-09-01 11:04:30 UTC
The sysctl aio tweaks improve the stability of VB running a Windows7 guest, but heavy IO still caused a problem for me.  For example, I was able to get through the Windows installation after making the sysctl changes, but later, during installing of many Windows updates, Windows locks up and eventually a BSOD appears with complaints about possible hardware issues.  This is running virtualbox-ose-5.1.26 on 11.1-RELEASE-p1 amd64.

P.S. 30000 already is the default for vfs.aio.aiod_lifetime on all my systems running 11.1.
Comment 6 Alan Somers freebsd_committer 2019-04-18 20:06:57 UTC
This sounds like a duplicate of bug 168298, which is also fixed (or at least, hidden) by higher aio resource limits.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 168298 ***