Bug 213649 - [patch] java/eclipse-cdt: update to 9.0.1 & take maintainership
Summary: [patch] java/eclipse-cdt: update to 9.0.1 & take maintainership
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Some People
Assignee: Tijl Coosemans
URL:
Keywords: patch
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2016-10-20 17:07 UTC by Michael Zhilin
Modified: 2017-01-12 19:29 UTC (History)
0 users

See Also:

Attachments
SVN patch file (114.88 KB, patch)
2016-10-20 17:07 UTC, Michael Zhilin 		no flags Details | Diff
View All Add an attachment (proposed patch, testcase, etc.)

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Michael Zhilin freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2016-10-20 17:07:58 UTC 
Created attachment 175986 [details]
SVN patch file

Hi,

Update Eclipse CDT to 9.0.1 & take maintainership. 
Portlint: looks fine :)
It works for me. 

There is one issue: it doesn't contain FreeBSD native libs. The impact is small (few features doesn't work), but in general CDT is awesome. I'm working on FreeBSD native libs, I hope it will be ready for next CDT update (CDT9.1 is available, but it requires Eclipse Neon.1, not yet in ports tree). 

Many thanks!
Comment 1 commit-hook freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2017-01-12 19:24:29 UTC 
A commit references this bug:

Author: tijl
Date: Thu Jan 12 19:24:06 UTC 2017
New revision: 431296
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/431296

Log:
  Update Eclipse CDT to 9.0.1 and assign port to submitter.

  PR:		213649
  Submitted by:	Michael Zhilin <mizhka@gmail.com>

Changes:
  head/java/eclipse-cdt/Makefile
  head/java/eclipse-cdt/distinfo
  head/java/eclipse-cdt/files/
  head/java/eclipse-cdt/pkg-descr
  head/java/eclipse-cdt/pkg-plist
  head/java/eclipse-cdt/scripts/
Comment 2 Tijl Coosemans freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2017-01-12 19:29:24 UTC 
Committed with minor changes.  I also didn't commit files/pkg-install.in because it wasn't used (not in SUB_FILES) and the touch command it was supposed to execute seemed unnecessary.