Created attachment 180686 [details] svn diff (patch) for textproc/sansi this pr(1) updates textproc/sansi to version 1.0.2 changes to source are largely documentation related. changes to port Makefile PORTVERSION distfile adds TIMESTAMP updates file info TESTED ON: FreeBSD trump.whitehouse.gov 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r314700: Sun Mar 5 09:01:30 PST 2017 root@trump.whitehouse.gov:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DEVBOXND amd64 That's it! Please find patch, and QA LOG attached to this pr(1) Thanks! --Chris
Created attachment 180687 [details] QA LOG for textproc/sansi QA LOG for textproc/sansi Please note: please disregard the error (notice) emitted, as it's a false positive "Notice: You have some Perl modules as dependencies but you do not have devel/p5-Module-CoreList installed, the perlcore QA check gets better results when using it, especially with older Perl versions." man(1) and perldoc(1) both tell me that Module::CoreList as well as perlcore are both installed -- I actually use them. Should I file a pr(1) against the ports framework?
A commit references this bug: Author: riggs Date: Sat Mar 11 07:51:49 UTC 2017 New revision: 435885 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/435885 Log: Update to upstream version 1.0.2 PR: 217677 Submitted by: portmaster@bsdforge.com (maintainer) Changes: head/textproc/sansi/Makefile head/textproc/sansi/distinfo
(In reply to Chris Hutchinson from comment #1) Since it is just a "notice" (it is not reported as an error) you would not need to worry about it. But of course, if this could/should be improved, feel free to open a pr, preferably with a proposal. Regarding the port: stage-qa notices that there are no arch dependent files in the package. For the next submission, you could check whether NO_ARCH=yes is appropriate.