Created attachment 183171 [details]
This is minor bug-fix release.
Clean summary. maintainer-feedback (+) is only required if requested (?).
@Ivan Can you confirm this change passes QA? (poudriere in particular)
Created attachment 183178 [details]
QA attached. For the future: should I always attach poudriere logs or QA passed statement should be enough?
@Ivan QA confirmation is sufficient unless logs are specifically requested (usually for additional information to isolate/debug), but its good to know details (like below) without being overly verbose:
portlint: OK (looks fine.)
testport: OK (poudriere, <versions>, <archs>, <OPTIONS> tested)
A commit references this bug:
Date: Mon Jun 5 15:26:51 UTC 2017
New revision: 442667
- Update to 1.30.4
Submitted by: email@example.com (maintainer)
> QA attached. For the future: should I always attach poudriere logs or QA passed statement should be enough?
QA passed statement is quite enough.