Bug 226019 - databases/ldb update port to the 1.1.29 version
Summary: databases/ldb update port to the 1.1.29 version
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Some People
Assignee: Walter Schwarzenfeld
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2018-02-19 00:16 UTC by Timur I. Bakeyev
Modified: 2018-03-05 08:39 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments
Patch to update the databases/ldb port (6.84 KB, patch)
2018-02-19 00:16 UTC, Timur I. Bakeyev
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Timur I. Bakeyev freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-02-19 00:16:53 UTC
Dear maintainer!

Please, update the ldb port to the 1.1.29 version.

The corresponding patch is attached to this report.
Comment 1 Timur I. Bakeyev freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-02-19 00:16:55 UTC
Created attachment 190770 [details]
Patch to update the databases/ldb port
Comment 2 Timur I. Bakeyev freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-02-19 00:18:01 UTC
As this port introduces FLAVORS, I can't commit it without portmgr approval. 

Please, take a look.
Comment 3 Antoine Brodin freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-02-19 06:32:49 UTC
It seems that what you want is subpackages,  not flavors.
Comment 4 Timur I. Bakeyev freebsd_committer freebsd_triage 2018-02-20 00:20:15 UTC
(In reply to Antoine Brodin from comment #3)
Sub-packages would solve a lot of packaging issues when they'll be ready, but ATM they are not available.

Two different flavors right now can help to address situation that there is (a limited) subset of users who need package without Python bindings, as they use it on embedded devices for limited functionality.

As all 6 supplementary packages are interconnected there is a sense of having same `nopython` flavor to depend on sibling `nopython` packages, while the default configuration can have normal dependencies.

As I understand, having @${FLAVOR} in the BUILD|RUN|LIB|TEST_DEPENDS is not fully supported yet, otherwise it would have sense to add such a specification to the related ports.
Comment 5 Walter Schwarzenfeld freebsd_triage 2018-03-05 08:39:32 UTC
Done with
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=revision&revision=462465