Hello, I've noticed that the current greybird-theme version in ports accumulates glitches with the latest batch of xfce updates (mostly regaring gtk3 stuff). I'd like to propose an update that bring this port up to date. Here's a bit of QA: x11-themes/greybird-theme# portlint looks fine. x11-themes/greybird-theme# make check-plist ====> Checking for pkg-plist issues (check-plist) ===> Parsing plist ===> Checking for items in STAGEDIR missing from pkg-plist ===> Checking for items in pkg-plist which are not in STAGEDIR ===> No pkg-plist issues found (check-plist) Thanks for your time,
Created attachment 191332 [details] Update to 3.22.6 Grr, seems bugzilla won't upload the patch if javascript is not enabled in browser. Fixed.
The patch has rejects.
Really? That's quite weird, I just reapplied it after svn revert'ing x11-themes/greybird-theme: Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: Makefile |=================================================================== |--- Makefile (revision 463940) |+++ Makefile (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file Makefile using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 2 with fuzz 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: distinfo |=================================================================== |--- distinfo (revision 463940) |+++ distinfo (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file distinfo using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 1. Hmm... The next patch looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: pkg-plist |=================================================================== |--- pkg-plist (revision 463940) |+++ pkg-plist (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file pkg-plist using Plan A... Hunk #1 succeeded at 11. Hunk #2 succeeded at 73. done
Please also attach the shar then. Thanks!
Possible duplicate of Bug #219254.
(In reply to w.schwarzenfeld from comment #5) Thanks, w.schwarzenfeld.