Created attachment 192774 [details] patch file for 0.9_1 -> 1.0 upgrade
I'll take this one
Hi Tassilo, There is no need to add [MAINTAINER] or [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] in the subject. It clutters the PR database. Also, you can add the maintainer-approval flag for the patch :)
Sorry... I just follow the porter's handbook, and it says " If the submitter is also maintaining the port, be sure to put [MAINTAINER] at the beginning of the Summary line." [1] Maybe it needs some updating? Anyways, thanks for working on this and telling me about the flag. [1] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/port-upgrading.html
(In reply to Tassilo Philipp from comment #3) You're actually right about the doc. I've seen MAINTAINER in disuse lately, but it's not big deal anyway :)
Hi Tassilo, I don't have any ARM devices to test this port on. Can you confirm this builds in ARM too?
(In reply to Fernando Apesteguía from comment #5) To my knowledge it does. I did build it on a raspberry pi and also on an arm64 version of FreeBSD. The results are even available as prebuilds, here: http://www.dyncall.org/download Both where done on FreeBSD 11, though.
A commit references this bug: Author: fernape Date: Fri Apr 27 20:59:13 UTC 2018 New revision: 468498 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/468498 Log: Update devel/dyncall to 1.0 PR: 227737 Reported by: tphilipp@potion-studios.com (maintainer) Approved by: tcberner (mentor) Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15213 Changes: head/devel/dyncall/Makefile head/devel/dyncall/distinfo head/devel/dyncall/pkg-plist
Committed, Thanks!