Created attachment 195063 [details] mono-aarch64.patch I don't know why I did this, I'm not even planning to use .NET on my RPi3, I guess it was just bothering me that it worked on armv7 and not aarch64… (also I needed to do something in parallel while Crystal was compiling on the ThunderX I rented from packet.net) Hopefully I didn't screw anything up (I was modifying the port as errors appeared, did not clean and rebuild from scratch — it's slow and access to a ThunderX is expensive… honestly it's not much faster than RPi here because of an issue described below) The Roslyn C# compiler has a concurrency problem on aarch64: https://github.com/mono/mono/issues/7017 (not FreeBSD specific) so the workaround is to disable parallelism… so the .NET libraries are built very very slowly :( BoringSSL patch is from bug 223019 but slightly modified (to ignore <sys/auxv.h>), see comment in that thread. Also there was an intermittent jemalloc error, had to restart the build once: <jemalloc>: /usr/src/contrib/jemalloc/include/jemalloc/internal/extent_inlines.h:63: Failed assertion: "szind < NSIZES" ================================================================= Got a SIGABRT while executing native code. This usually indicates a fatal error in the mono runtime or one of the native libraries used by your application. ================================================================= gmake[14]: *** [../../../build/library.make:342: ../../../class/lib/net_4_x-linux/Facades/System.IO.FileSystem.Primitives.dll] Abort trap (core dumped)
(In reply to Greg V from comment #0) Can you regenerate the patch, the plist patch is broken: svn patch --strip 3 --dry-run patch.aarch64 U Makefile > applied hunk @@ -60,6 +60,15 @@ with offset 4 > applied hunk @@ -88,4 +97,4 @@ with offset 4 A files/extra-patch-aarch64-race-workaround U files/patch-configure.ac A files/patch-external_boringssl_crypto_cpu-aarch64-linux.c A files/patch-mono_sgen_sgen-archdep.h A files/patch-mono_utils_mono-sigcontext.h C pkg-plist > rejected hunk @@ -2937,38 +2937,38 @@ Summary of conflicts: Text conflicts: 1 It builds fine on -current (I don't have the jemalloc issue and I don't need the extra patch on my board), have you tried on 11.1 or 11.2?
Created attachment 195945 [details] mono-aarch64.patch Sure, this should be a diff against current master. I only tried on CURRENT. jemalloc — maybe you got lucky, it only happened once during my build. Or maybe this was fixed — I used an old current snapshot for the build. extra-patch — looks like the model of the processor matters. The concurrency bug is definitely happening on Cavium ThunderX (it's been happening to everyone on Linux before I even tried on FreeBSD).
It builds fine on 11.1.