Bug 237275 - Mk/Uses/gssapi.mk: don't set GSSAPILDFLAGS for USES=gssapi
Summary: Mk/Uses/gssapi.mk: don't set GSSAPILDFLAGS for USES=gssapi
Status: New
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Ports Framework (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Some People
Assignee: Piotr Kubaj
Depends on:
Reported: 2019-04-14 09:19 UTC by Piotr Kubaj
Modified: 2019-07-26 16:43 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
bugzilla: maintainer-feedback? (timp87)
antoine: exp-run+

patch (451 bytes, patch)
2019-04-14 09:19 UTC, Piotr Kubaj
no flags Details | Diff
v2 (467 bytes, patch)
2019-07-21 11:07 UTC, Piotr Kubaj
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Piotr Kubaj freebsd_committer 2019-04-14 09:19:57 UTC
Created attachment 203658 [details]

Setting GSSAPILDFLAGS for USES=gssapi causes -L/usr/lib to be added to LDFLAGS.

This breaks compilation of some ports, like www/squid on GCC architectures when new GCC from ports needs to be used.

The new GCC tries to link to libstdc++ and fails. Not setting it explicitely causes /usr/local/lib/gcc8/libstdc++.so to be taken instead and /usr/lib is searched for libraries anyway, just with lower priority.

Tested on powerpc64 and amd64 on www/squid.
Comment 1 Piotr Kubaj freebsd_committer 2019-06-27 14:10:42 UTC
This probably requires exp-run.
Comment 2 Antoine Brodin freebsd_committer 2019-07-09 05:51:51 UTC
The patch doesn't look good,  it should probably set GSSAPILDFLAGS to an empty value
Comment 3 Piotr Kubaj freebsd_committer 2019-07-21 11:07:03 UTC
Created attachment 205968 [details]

Ok, here's the new patch.

Just as a side note, I build the whole ports tree for powerpc64 at https://talos.anongoth.pl/build.html?mastername=powerpc64-default&build=2019-07-21_11h14m38s with this patch and it pretty much works.
Comment 4 Antoine Brodin freebsd_committer 2019-07-26 16:43:50 UTC
Exp-run looks fine