It seems that rdoc of lang/ruby26 is broken. Any idea? % rdoc docs/bdb.rb Traceback (most recent call last): 2: from /usr/local/bin/rdoc:23:in `<main>' 1: from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:302:in `activate_bin_path' /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:283:in `find_spec_for_exe': can't find gem rdoc (>= 0.a) with executable rdoc (Gem::GemNotFoundException) % rdoc26 docs/bdb.rb Traceback (most recent call last): 2: from /usr/local/bin/rdoc26:23:in `<main>' 1: from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:302:in `activate_bin_path' /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:283:in `find_spec_for_exe': can't find gem rdoc (>= 0.a) with executable rdoc (Gem::GemNotFoundException) % ruby -v ruby 2.6.3p62 (2019-04-16 revision 67580) [amd64-freebsd11]
ri and irb doesn't work, too. % ri26 Traceback (most recent call last): 2: from /usr/local/bin/ri26:23:in `<main>' 1: from /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:302:in `activate_bin_path' /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:283:in `find_spec_for_exe': can't find gem rdoc (>= 0.a) with executable ri (Gem::GemNotFoundException) % irb26 Traceback (most recent call last): 2: from /usr/local/bin/irb26:23:in `<main>' 1: from /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:302:in `activate_bin_path' /usr/local/lib/ruby/2.6/rubygems.rb:283:in `find_spec_for_exe': can't find gem irb (>= 0.a) with executable irb (Gem::GemNotFoundException)
Have you installed it rubygem-rdoc for Ruby 2.6? See how /usr/local/bin/rdoc be. It is just a wrapper script since Ruby 2.6. Not an rdoc itself. rubygem-rdoc port needs to be installed. Same with irb. Ruby < 2.6, /usr/local/bin/irb is a irb itself. However Ruby >= 2.6 , it is no longer irb itself. It is a wrapper script to call irb gem. irb gem port doesn't exist right now. It should be created.
I've created bug 237830 for irb.
(In reply to Koichiro Iwao from comment #2) Yes, I confirmed that installing rubygem-rdoc makes rdoc work. However, I cannot think that it is intentional to installbroken rdoc without rubygem-rdoc installed.
(In reply to Hajimu UMEMOTO from comment #4) It is not intentional. What about adding these gems runtime dependency of lang/ruby26?
Created attachment 204366 [details] patch
(In reply to Koichiro Iwao from comment #5) Adding run_depend to gems is still workaround. Installing broken rdoc by lang/ruby26 seems bad idea.
(In reply to Hajimu UMEMOTO from comment #7) However, it is a gem. What is your plan?
(In reply to Koichiro Iwao from comment #8) I'm not sure how the default gem should be handled, but, the default gem seems different from the regular gem. Perhaps, it should be: 1. Stop installing the broken bin scripts and useless related libs if any, by lang/ruby26. 2. Providing the separated default gem port like ruby26-rdoc which built and installed from the Ruby 2.6.X source. 3. The separated default gem port installs the bin script as well. 4. Optionally, the separate ports are RUN_DEPENDS from lang/ruby26. 5. The rubygem-rdoc can be installed to use latest version of the rdoc.
I will learn about default gem and consider what should be done.
As I already mentioned, irb, rdoc, ri and perhaps other components are installed as default gems since Ruby 2.6. However, files/patch-tool_rbinstall.rb prevents installing default gems. This is the cause why rdoc etc is not installed. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/lang/ruby26/files/patch-tool_rbinstall.rb?revision=501068&view=markup#l27 There should be a certain reason why this patch is added. Just removing the patch might break something so the patch needs to be removed carefully.