Created attachment 205179 [details]
The patch file
Print req->index instead of printing the pointer itself to
avoid kernel pointer leakage.
Signed-off-by: Fuqian Huang <email@example.com>
sys/dev/mpt/mpt.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sys/dev/mpt/mpt.c b/sys/dev/mpt/mpt.c
index 6e41ff079e9..6ea00fc8bb1 100644
@@ -488,8 +488,8 @@ mpt_default_reply_handler(struct mpt_softc *mpt, request_t *req,
- "Default Handler Called: req=%p:%u reply_descriptor=%x frame=%p\n",
- req, req->serno, reply_desc, reply_frame);
+ "Default Handler Called: req=%u:%u reply_descriptor=%x frame=%p\n",
+ req->index, req->serno, reply_desc, reply_frame);
if (reply_frame != NULL)
(In reply to Fuqian from comment #0)
I have noticed that you have opened a lot of bug reports of a similar kind.
Could you please explain what real problem do you see?
In you opinion, how can such a "disclosure" be exploited?
Perhaps it was worthwhile discussing your thoughts on some mailing lists before starting to create reports prolifically.