Bug 239117 - graphics/gegl: 0.4.16 - patch fail
Summary: graphics/gegl: 0.4.16 - patch fail
Status: Closed FIXED
Alias: None
Product: Ports & Packages
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Individual Port(s) (show other bugs)
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any Any
: --- Affects Many People
Assignee: freebsd-gnome (Nobody)
Depends on:
Reported: 2019-07-10 17:41 UTC by rozhuk.im
Modified: 2019-07-11 12:02 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

See Also:
bugzilla: maintainer-feedback? (gnome)

Update for this patch (813 bytes, patch)
2019-07-10 22:23 UTC, VVD
no flags Details | Diff

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description rozhuk.im 2019-07-10 17:41:13 UTC
===>  Cleaning for gegl-0.4.16
===>  License BSD3CLAUSE GPLv3+ LGPL3+ LGPL20+ accepted by the user
===>   gegl-0.4.16 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found
===> Fetching all distfiles required by gegl-0.4.16 for building
===>  Extracting for gegl-0.4.16
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for gegl-0.4.16.tar.bz2.
===>  Patching for gegl-0.4.16
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for gegl-0.4.16
2 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to gegl/gegl-config.c.rej
=> FreeBSD patch patch-gegl_gegl-config.c failed to apply cleanly.
=> Patch(es)  patch-08084a6 patch-a6bcf48 applied cleanly.
*** Error code 1
Comment 1 VVD 2019-07-10 22:23:21 UTC
Created attachment 205676 [details]
Update for this patch

Tested compilling on 12.0 amd64 and 12.0 i386.
Comment 2 rozhuk.im 2019-07-10 22:35:44 UTC
Build OK.
Comment 3 Tobias Kortkamp freebsd_committer 2019-07-11 06:20:34 UTC
Already fixed by antoine@ in ports r506387.
Comment 4 VVD 2019-07-11 11:21:21 UTC
(In reply to Tobias Kortkamp from comment #3)
> Already fixed by antoine@ in ports r506387.
It isn't fixed the patch - it's just removed it…
Comment 5 Ting-Wei Lan 2019-07-11 11:47:21 UTC
(In reply to VVD from comment #4)
It is correct to remove the patch. The function of patch-gegl_gegl-config.c has been replaced by patch-a6bcf48, which was added during the update to 0.4.16. Please see ports r506362.
Comment 6 VVD 2019-07-11 12:02:34 UTC
(In reply to Ting-Wei Lan from comment #5)
Thanks for explanation, you are right.