Bug 239380 - sys.netpfil.pf.forward.{v4,v6} and sys.netpfil.pf.set_tos.v4 fail on i386
Summary: sys.netpfil.pf.forward.{v4,v6} and sys.netpfil.pf.set_tos.v4 fail on i386
Status: New
Alias: None
Product: Base System
Classification: Unclassified
Component: tests (show other bugs)
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: i386 Any
: --- Affects Only Me
Assignee: freebsd-testing mailing list
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2019-07-22 14:23 UTC by Li-Wen Hsu
Modified: 2019-08-12 19:29 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:


Attachments

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description Li-Wen Hsu freebsd_committer 2019-07-22 14:23:35 UTC
These 3 tests always fail on i386:

sys.netpfil.pf.forward.v4
sys.netpfil.pf.forward.v6
sys.netpfil.pf.set_tos.v4

There are some analysis from kp@:

https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/2019-June/001933.html
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-testing/2019-June/001934.html
Comment 1 commit-hook freebsd_committer 2019-07-22 18:55:23 UTC
A commit references this bug:

Author: lwhsu
Date: Mon Jul 22 18:54:26 UTC 2019
New revision: 350221
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350221

Log:
  Temporarily skip sys.netpfil.pf.forward.{v4,v6} and sys.netpfil.pf.set_tos.v4
  on i386 as they are flakey on it

  PR:		239380
  Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation

Changes:
  head/tests/sys/netpfil/pf/forward.sh
  head/tests/sys/netpfil/pf/set_tos.sh
Comment 2 commit-hook freebsd_committer 2019-07-23 08:21:30 UTC
A commit references this bug:

Author: lwhsu
Date: Tue Jul 23 08:20:53 UTC 2019
New revision: 350237
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/350237

Log:
  MFC r350221

  Temporarily skip sys.netpfil.pf.forward.{v4,v6} and sys.netpfil.pf.set_tos.v4
  on i386 as they are flakey on it

  PR:		239380
  Sponsored by:	The FreeBSD Foundation

Changes:
_U  stable/12/
  stable/12/tests/sys/netpfil/pf/forward.sh
  stable/12/tests/sys/netpfil/pf/set_tos.sh
Comment 3 Ed Maste freebsd_committer 2019-08-12 19:29:45 UTC
(In reply to Li-Wen Hsu from comment #0)
kp suggests it appears to be a bpf issue