It's a bit suspicious that FFS and UFS2 and both explicitly mentioned in the fsdb man page, but ZFS is not at all.
The sentence with UFS2 is probably wrong: "Note that btime is available on UFS2 file systems only." ZFS also supports birth time. Does fsdb really not support changing it on ZFS?
The sentence with FFS is perhaps incomplete: "Use this tool with extreme caution--you can damage an FFS file system beyond what fsck(8) can repair". Can one damage other file systems too?
Why is it suspicious? fsdb is a UFS/FFS tool.
fsdb – FFS debugging/editing tool
> "Note that btime is available on UFS2 file systems only."
The point of comparison is UFS1. ZFS is out of scope of the page.
Thanks for your fast response.
I am pretty new to FreeBSD, so of course what seems obvious to you is perhaps unclear to newbies. :)
The name 'fsdb' suggested 'file system debug', I didn't expect it to apply to only one filesystem.
> fsdb – FFS debugging/editing tool
You know, I think I only saw one 'F' :), like: 'FS debugging/editing tool'
>The point of comparison is UFS1. ZFS is out of scope of the page.
Which was not obvious to me before now.
Perhaps some wording could be improved nevertheless. ex, that very first line could be:
fsdb – FFS/UFS debugging/editing tool
"FFS" seems to be a lesser known acronym, ex: Wikipedia's disambiguation page lists "Flash File System" and "Formatted File System" but only "Berkeley Fast File System".
Even a short sentence to say that the tool supports no other file system would be nice IMHO.